User talk:Naduz

Blocked

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Yamla (talk) 12:10, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I can find out that someone else has misused the Wikipedia account. Naduz (talk) 16:32, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I request to please Right to vanish Naduz (talk) 16:33, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(Non-administrator comment) In the Wikipedia context it's called 'courtesy vanishing', and have you even read WP:Courtesy vanishing? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:37, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Double Grazing.. Naduz (talk) 16:39, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So what will do? Naduz (talk) 16:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have the right to be convinced that I have no part in this. Naduz (talk) 16:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I contributed lot of article and i got thanked from many users Naduz (talk) 16:42, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Now I read the Wikipedia,

I see that it is not possible to block accounts according to Wikipedia's policy. Naduz (talk) 16:46, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anyway,

Thankyou Double Grazing...:) Naduz (talk) 16:47, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Yamla

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Naduz (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Now only i have access wiki account Hacked through VPN

Decline reason:

Sorry, WP:COMPROMISED accounts cannot be unblocked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 16:05, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Naduz (talk) 14:51, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Technical evidence does not support this user's claims. I think this will surprise exactly nobody, given this user's behaviour here. --Yamla (talk) 19:49, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. If you pull that stunt again, you'll lose access to this talk page like you've lost access to other talk pages of your various abusive sockpuppet accounts. --Yamla (talk) 18:15, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I I apologies for that I mistakely done that. Naduz (talk) 18:18, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I sure that I not involved this.. Naduz (talk) 18:19, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

After i change my password now the account is secured Naduz (talk) 18:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

How i Claim that and unblock the account Naduz (talk) 18:20, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Had you been honest with us from the start, there could have been a path for you to get unblocked. As you've repeatedly gone out of your way to attempt to mislead us, though, there's no reasonable chance you'll be unblocked. --Yamla (talk) 18:22, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please Can you give me a chance ?

I will only read and edit what was Wikipedia's policies from now on i promise that.. Naduz (talk) 18:31, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

No. You've worked hard to clearly demonstrate you aren't willing to be honest with us (even now) and likely lack sufficient competence to edit Wikipedia even if you started being honest. --Yamla (talk) 18:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If there are any more in unnecessary edits from my side. Then can you block my account permanently. Naduz (talk) 18:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

NO. --Yamla (talk) 18:35, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If I can't say anything more than this, my honest, block my tanking page too.. Naduz (talk) 18:41, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Done. --Yamla (talk) 18:42, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.