User talk:Nashassum
Page moving
[edit]What the hell are you doing? J.delanoygabsadds 03:39, 15 July 2009 (UTC)
Correcting falsehoods, POV and original research.
Michael Jackson
[edit]Use the talk page for potentially controversial edits. Pyrrhus16 16:12, 29 July 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
[edit]You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Michael Jackson. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Dr.K. logos 02:36, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
Omer Bhatti
[edit]Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes.
- your message was removed because it seemed either ignorant or racist. either way it is an inappropriate comment. --emerson7 03:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- I couldn't care less if you think my comment is "ignorant". Do not remove comments from talk pages, that is considered vandalism. Nashassum (talk) 05:59, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- If Omer Bhatti is so un-noteable, then why have you been commenting on him? It seems to me that deletion for non-noteability should be reserved for people no one ever heard of. People have heard of Omer Bhatti. Timothy Horrigan (talk) 14:28, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
- Only in connection with his relationship with Michael Jackson. He's not notable per se. People only known in connection with their relationship with a famous person are not notable. Nashassum (talk) 17:44, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
just so that you know, the term 'negro' can be considered a perjorative, and i didn't bother with removing it since i was sure the entire article would soon be deleted. in future, you should be careful to not use such offensive terms in your writings. --emerson7 21:43, 12 August 2009 (UTC)
Your edits at Michael Jackson
[edit]Your edits there have been reverted. You need to discuss your proposed changes at the talkpage, as multiple editors find them controversial. UnitAnode 15:07, 4 August 2009 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.