User talk:Natedunning95

Talk Page

Welcome

Hello, I'm Viewmont Viking. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.--VViking_TalkEdits 22:24, 5 April 2022 (UTC)

In what way is factually editing the various locations to reflect current listed chapters advertising? These are non-biased factual updates about the group to prevent people from being misled into looking for things in places where they are not. Natedunning95 (talk) 03:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)

April 2022

Hello Natedunning95. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Young Conservatives of Texas, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Natedunning95. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Natedunning95|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Unless you are not the Nate Dunning who is IT director you clearly need to comply with the above. Doug Weller talk 12:01, 6 April 2022 (UTC)