User talk:NebuchudnezzarXerxes

October 2023[edit]

Hello, I'm AntiDionysius. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Sleepy Joe (Joe Biden) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. That's alright, I was going to remove it anyway. It was just a joke for a screenshot I was going to take. Have a good day! NebuchudnezzarXerxes (talk) 23:35, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not make joke edits, even ones you subsequently remove. Doing so is considered disruptive editing. AntiDionysius (talk) 23:36, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Understood. NebuchudnezzarXerxes (talk) 23:37, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cool username tho AntiDionysius (talk) 23:38, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I really like Mesopotamian kings. NebuchudnezzarXerxes (talk) 02:52, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

November 2023[edit]

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Swastika did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 19:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Swastika. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 01:45, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

What? I thought I explained myself well enough. The word "ancient" is gratuitous in this situation… NebuchudnezzarXerxes (talk) 02:01, 9 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]