User talk:Neil Gibbons
Welcome!
Hello, Neil Gibbons, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ants in peterborough, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! — Abhishek Talk 09:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ants in peterborough
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ants in peterborough requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}
) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. — Abhishek Talk 09:11, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
TUSC token 178fd03b13d87f8b9d7185a4d021af79
[edit]I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
You are cool Neil Gibbons (talk) 16:44, 4 July 2011 (UTC) |
Talkback
[edit]Message added 16:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
— Abhishek Talk 16:56, 4 July 2011 (UTC)
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Nikthestoned 10:21, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
July 2011
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Favonian (talk) 10:34, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Neil Gibbons (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I am appualed quite frankly at the layout of wikipedia. I try to create a page about my buisness for non promotional purposes and instantly I am selected for what is known as 'speedy deletion'. THen I ask another user for help, but merely ignored. I am furthermore locked for association in vandalism. If you call this vandalism I wonder what you will experience as you enter the real world. Subsequently I ask you to revoke this block and reconsider your etiquette.Neil Gibbons (talk) 16:09, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Your last few edits made your intent crystal clear. Thank you for the advice. Kuru (talk) 16:14, 6 July 2011 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Talk page access has been revoked because of abuse of it. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:01, 7 July 2011 (UTC)