Jump to content

User talk:Nelodkan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Howdy, Nelodkan, Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions, you seem to be off to a good start. Hopefully you will soon join the vast army of Wikipediholics! If you need help on how to title new articles see the naming conventions, and for help on formatting the pages visit the manual of style. For general questions goto Wikipedia:Help or the FAQ, if you can't find your answer there check the Village Pump (for Wikipedia related questions) or the Reference Desk (for general questions)! There's still more help at the Tutorial and Policy Library. Plus, don't forget to visit the Community Portal. If you have any more questions after that, feel free to ask me directly on my user talk page.


Additional tips

[edit]

Here's some extra tips to help you get around in the 'pedia!

You can find me at my user page or talk page for any questions. Happy editing, and we'll see ya 'round.

Joe I 04:21, 14 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Comments on Borovo Selo raid

[edit]

Please add your statement on views at the top of the talk page in the designated area. Asterion talk to me 05:26, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Please observe the three revert rule on Neo-Nazism and Vladimir Žerjavić – you shouldn't revert an article more than three times within any 24 hours period. Also, please avoid circumventing this rule through creation of new accounts or similar practices. Thanks. --Elephantus 09:07, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a soapbox

[edit]

Hello again. Looking at some of your edits recently, I think you should read carefully and try to adhere to "Wikipedia is not a soapbox" policy. Propaganda or advocacy can be reported about, but shouldn't be engaged in. Thanks. --Elephantus 09:34, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

User notice: temporary 3RR block

[edit]

Regarding reversions[1] made on May 21 2006 (UTC) to Vladimir Žerjavić

[edit]
You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

The duration of the block is 12 hours. William M. Connolley 10:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR

[edit]

Hi Nelodkan, you've been reported for a 3RR violation at Neo-Nazism and have been blocked for 24 hours. When you return, please use the talk page to discuss the dispute. Cheers, SlimVirgin (talk) 09:35, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Are You expert in unified filed theory???

[edit]

Hi,

What do you know about how Rudjer Boscovich's work relates to Einstein's attempts for a unified field theory.

I see that You and many of your pals keep insisting on this and I found highly unlikely that all of you are experts in physics.

Reverting articles without even checking what changes You actually make in the process seams like better explanation of what you people do.

So, please, at least check what You actually doing when reverting articles. Is ti so hard?

--Ante Perkovic 10:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I asked You a legitimate question, based on WP:CITE rule, but You didn't answer me. So, I added a request for citation.

So, if You really know something about this, please provide the reference. Since You added this sentence yourself, I believe this will not a problem for You.

Regards, Ante Perkovic 18:54, 24 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I see You added te reference. Good :). Thanks. --Ante Perkovic 08:15, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your recent contributions to Borovo Selo killings. Please make sure that when you add content to the article that you follow Wikipedia's fundamental policies, which I've summarised at Talk:Borovo Selo killings#Rules of engagement. These rules of engagement will be enforced. I have no objection to your recent additions but please make sure that they are properly sourced - I've removed a few of your points from the article until they can be sourced. Also, please do not remove referenced content without any explanation for, I would guess, POV reasons (i.e. the "symbolic re-enactment" line). I've restored this. -- ChrisO 00:34, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the citations, that's much better! -- ChrisO 01:14, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I wants to thank Nelodkan for good work in finding consensus on Borovo Selo killings. Good work! --Ante Perkovic 08:29, 25 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]