User talk:NeuroBioScience

April 2023[edit]

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Caster Semenya, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:10, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Caster Semenya. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 13:19, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are very disruptive. I strongly urge you to discuss your changes on the article Talk pages before making any more similar edits, or you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 13:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Greetings Bbb23. Thank you for the feedback. I am a new user and unsure why I was blocked. I am clearly learning lessons.

I have reviewed the Behavioral Guideline and believe that I had complied. I was unaware of BlazeWolf level of concerns and did not knowingly disregard their input.

Please advise and educate me, what specific components were “very disruptive” and why blocked?

My background is as a medical science doctorate with multiple peer review articles published. I have a long history as LGBQT Ally and am a proud parent of wonderful a trans-woman.

My intention with edits were to use simple language to:

1. Support and respect the athlete’s stated preference for their gender as a woman.

2. Support and respect that these athletes have nature medical conditions. Unlike some right wing posters in media state, the athlete’s were not intentionally ‘cheating’

3. Clarify and improved context for readers regarding 46,XY DSD. This is consistent with the existing Wikipedia pages for Karyotype (genetic Male XY and genetic Female XX) and DSD’s in women who have been assigned as females since birth.

A) the natural underlying medical genetic variation of 46,XY DSD results in these individuals having naturally elevated testosterone levels

B) these testosterone levels are in the male range prior to treatment

C) the suppression medications under the athletics sports associations are to bring naturally elevated testosterone levels from the male range vs female ranges

So, trying to apply existing Wiki knowledge to add medical insights to a setting where many people have confusion.

Thank you

N NeuroBioScience (talk) 16:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:NeuroBioScience[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:NeuroBioScience requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Someone who's wrong on the internet (talk) 19:16, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]