User talk:NeuroGORL

This is NeuroGORL's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judith Eisen (March 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This is not intended as promotional, but it is written in a promotional way. don't refer to anyone by their first name except performers--only PR people do that, do give a sense of personal involvement. don't use vague phrases like "successful" "lead role" or "a program focused on" or "new insights" -- they have no actual meaning. She is almost certainly notable`, but it will be because of the demonstrate influence of her work. This is best shown by giving her 5 most cited peer-reviewed papers, and specifying the number of citations. For the AAAS, if the award was being an elected fellow, say that specifically, because it is considered to prove notability . And don't claim too much, as do PR people -- Danio was firmly established as one of the most important model organisms long before her work.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Judith Eisen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Judith Eisen, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NeuroGORL! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 06:56, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cecilia Moens (March 8)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Moens is notable, but this article does not show it. [WP:PROF]] is the standard, and it relies on the demonstrated influence of her work. This is best shown by giving her 5 most cited peer-reviewed papers, and specifying the number of citations.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cecilia Moens and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cecilia Moens, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 06:59, 8 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Cecilia Moens concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Cecilia Moens, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:35, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Judith Eisen[edit]

Hi User:NeuroGORL! I see you created this draft article. I created a page for Judith S. Eisen last November. The page has been reviewed by both Wikipedia and Judith Eisen. I am an emertia math prof from U Oregon. Mvitulli (talk) 21:11, 11 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]