User talk:Newsmaker2000

Notability of Michelle Beadle

A tag has been placed on Michelle Beadle requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. — Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim}^dagnabbit!) 16:15, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Michelle Beadle

If you do not have a reliable source, you can not put the information in the article.
Please read WP:OR for why the pictures don't "speak for themselves" and WP:BLP for why the information has to be sourced to be included. --Onorem♠Dil 16:26, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Seriously. Are you confused about this? Did you read the links above? You are not going to add information that makes this person look like she is a porn actress without a reliable source. You're not going to say there are rumors. You're not going to use an image of Spring Thomas and call it Michelle Beadle. The image is a copyright violation anyway, and should be deleted soon. --Onorem♠Dil 17:02, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

To reply to your comment on my talk page, which simply reiterates what is here already, you cannot simply assert that Spring Thomas and Michelle Beadle are the same person, you have to provide a reliable source. A link to a forum comment by some random person is not reliable. Even if you are able to provide such a source, you can't then use pictures that are under copyright, as that is a copyright violation. Probably the best place to continue this discussion would be on the article's talk page.— Timotab ^{Timothy (not Tim}^dagnabbit!) 18:01, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Michelle Beadle photograph.jpg

Image Copyright problem

This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Michelle Beadle photograph.jpg. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 16:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. Thank you. HermesBot 16:44, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:MichelleBeadle.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:1404.jpg. The copy called Image:1404.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 17:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles, as you did at Michelle Beadle. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
Waiting a month doesn't mean you get to call her a porn star without a reliable source. Stop. --Onorem♠Dil 17:15, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Michelle Beadle. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. _{TravellingCari}^{the Busy Bee} 19:19, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]