User talk:Ngsoderstrom

December 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Reuben G. Soderstrom, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Reuben G. Soderstrom was changed by Ngsoderstrom (u) (t) redirecting article to non-existant page on 2009-12-19T21:36:24+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 21:36, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ngsoderstrom

Hi Do you have the titlke of the NY Times articles you cite? Would be nice if you give them. The first link is dead! Do you have an alternative ref for that? Thanks.--Stone (talk) 22:13, 19 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Stone

Thanks. I included the title of the NY Times article in the refs--looks like it's actually an AP article from Dec. 15 that was run Dec. 16. Not sure what the policy is on that? I also deleted that first link--I'm going to see if I can come across something better. (also, pardon me if this reply isn't in the appropriate format--not quite sure how it's supposed to be done. Thanks, again.)

Thanks

Your answer is OK! You will learn all the strange habits wikipedia developed in the years. The rules and the policies sometimes are hard to understand, for example have a look at MOS. I will have another look on the article today.-Stone (talk) 08:17, 20 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]