User talk:Nicklulli

Welcome!

Hello, Nicklulli, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one of your contributions does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Deconstructhis (talk) 23:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to WJXX. Thank you. Deconstructhis (talk) 23:03, 30 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeannie Greenwald

The article Jeannie Greenwald has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Vertium (talk to me) 23:07, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, LinkedIn is not a reliable source. Please read WP:GNG and WP:BLP for acceptable sources and subjects for a biographical article. This article fails on all accounts. Please do not remove the template again until you (or someone else) provides a reliable source. Thank you. Vertium (talk to me) 23:23, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Oops... forgot to mention that you should read WP:RS as well. It spells out what is or is not a reliable source. If you need help, let me know, but please do not keep removing the notice that the article is subject for deletion.

Jeanne Greenwald

Thanks for your note. Rather than reply on my talk page, I thought it might be easier for me to reply here, since I think you might be a new editor and unfamiliar with how "talkback" works.

First, when you leave a message on someone's talk page, it's customary to create a new section, so all their messages don't run together. (Don't worry - I went ahead and did that for you on my talk page). In order to do that, simply put two equal signs (==) before and after you're section heading. As an example, you might enter, ==References on Jeanne Greenwald== and then hit enter once or twice and then type your message.

Secondly, if you are the Nick Tulli that is referenced in the article, it's really frowned upon to write articles about yourself, and it doesn't lessen the impact if you shroud it in an article about someone else. Wikipedia's stance on notability is that if you're notable per the standards, someone will write about you because they read about you (moreso than because they know you). Notability means that someone has been noted in reliable sources (newspapers, magazines, subjects of books), not simply that you "know" they did something. As I mentioned on the article's talk page, if Ms. Greenwald isn't notable, then the article will likely be deleted. If her relationship with Nick Tulli isn't notable, that content will likely be deleted. Please don't take offense at this, it's just the way the encyclopedia works. There are lots of people who've started websites or done wonderful things in their career, but if it's not noted in reliable sources, it doesn't stay in Wikipedia.

I hope you'll continue to learn more about Wikipedia and the standards we try to hold as we update and enhance the encyclopedia. Please feel free to ask questions. Thanks. Vertium (talk to me) 10:30, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Summary

Please make a note in the edit summary of what you're updating in the article. It will be very helpful to those of us who review the article's history and updates. Many thanks. Vertium (talk to me) 14:52, 6 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jeannie Greenwald

The article Jeannie Greenwald has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not a single reliable independent source. PRODBLP was removed, in my opinion wrongly, as I cannot see any reliable source that confirms any of the information in the article. Moreover, even if sources were provided, I see nothing in the article to show that she is notable. See talk page.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]