User talk:Nitzkovic

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Nitzkovic, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Irn (talk) 02:23, 19 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

October 2011[edit]

Hi Nitzkovic. Thank you for your work on patrolling new pages and tagging for speedy deletion. I'm just letting you know that I declined your deletion request for Atomic Coffee Machine, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. Please take a moment to look at the suggested tasks for patrollers and review the criteria for speedy deletion. Particularly, the section covering non-criteria. Such pages are best tagged with proposed deletion, proposed deletion for biographies of living persons, or sent to the appropriate deletion discussion. Products don't fall under a speedy criteria unless it's spam, which this (except for one paragraph) isn't. Try WP:AFD Secret ^account 02:44, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop being disruptive[edit]

Your disruptive editing is unwelcome. Please stop making edits to prove your WP:POINT. Leave the Atomic article alone for a while I work on properly citing the registered design and patents. --Biker Biker (talk) 10:49, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The article is about one particular coffee machine... Mr. Robbiati made many machines that wore the name Atomic... so did his son. Mr. Stern in Austria trademarked the name "Atomic" internationally, and so did he too put the "Atomic" badge on many of his creations. By calling my corrections vandalism, you decide to deny the history of these businesses. With which aim? i don't know.

Looking at patents are fine. But a patent is a patent, nothing more. You can patent a shape, a function a design. You can't patent an "Atomic shape"... because "Atomic" is a trademark. You won't find no "Atomic" word on any of the patent, nor will you find an allusion to an atomic cloud or anything similar.

Call my contributions disruptive if you like... as long as you know what you are talking about, and feel knowledgeable enough to correct me. Then i can't discuss with you, and that's fine. If you think you are right, who am i to tell you you are mistaken? Nitzkovic (talk) 11:01, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011[edit]

Your recent editing history at Atomic Coffee Machine shows that you are in danger of breaking the three-revert rule, or that you may have already broken it. An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Breaking the three-revert rule often leads to a block. If you wish to avoid being blocked, instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. You may still be blocked for edit warring even if you do not exceed the technical limit of the three-revert rule if your behavior indicates that you intend to continue to revert repeatedly. MikeWazowski (talk) 20:14, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nitzkovic for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Biker Biker (talk) 20:17, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring and you[edit]

Please do not edit war like you have at Atomic Coffee Machine. As I asked the IP, I also ask you to explain how the other editors edits were "soap boxing". Thank you. Alexandria (talk) 20:30, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

could you try to rephrase the reason for "removing the soapboxing"? I'm having having some trouble understanding what you mean. Alexandria (talk) 20:52, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked[edit]

This account has been blocked from editing for a period of 3 days for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nitzkovic. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong ^{(say whaaat?!)} 04:36, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries[edit]

Please use edit summaries when you are in the process of making significant changes to an article. When you remove a large chunk of text (or add one) without an edit summary, it can raise red flags to reviewing editors. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:33, 12 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]