User talk:Northerncalifornian

July 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Binksternet. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Bohemian Grove seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 05:08, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bohemian Grove may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

S1 |title=Peter Martin Phillips, A Relative Advantage: Sociology of the San Francisco Bohemian Club], 1994. |accessdate=14 July 2014}}</ref>
the-bohemian-club-et-al/</ref> Prior to the suit being filed, Gelsinger was hired by Careless Camp (of which the Becktels & Charles Black Jr. (Shirley Temple's son) are members.<ref>http://

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:35, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bohemian Club may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

the-bohemian-club-et-al/</ref> Prior to the suit being filed, Gelsinger was hired by Careless Camp (of which the Becktels & Charles Black Jr. (Shirley Temple's son) are members.<ref>http://

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:51, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Bohemian Grove. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Please discuss your proposed text on the article talk page so that consensus may be reached about it. Binksternet (talk) 20:49, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Northerncalifornian. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 20:53, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for edit-warring and violations of the biographies of living persons policy, as you did at Bohemian Grove. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:22, 8 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Northerncalifornian (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #16100 was submitted on Jul 09, 2016 04:48:33. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 04:48, 9 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]