User talk:Nothingisreal1967
Appearance
This is Nothingisreal1967's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nothingisreal1967/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Nothingisreal1967!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 00:28, 5 March 2024 (UTC)
|
AfC notification: User:Nothingisreal1967/sandbox has a new comment
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/21/AFC-Logo.svg/50px-AFC-Logo.svg.png)
Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (April 17)
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Nothingisreal1967/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Let It Be Beatles (April 19)
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/7e/AFC-Logo_Decline.svg/50px-AFC-Logo_Decline.svg.png)
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Let It Be Beatles and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Let it Be Beatles
[edit]I'm not an Articles for Creation editor but I do sometimes see when people try to cite blogs. Let me offer two suggestions:
- (1) Cite actual newspapers and magazines, anything with an independent editorial voice. The Age has an article. Why wouldn't you cite that? That's the best I can find, but I found it in about 30 seconds searching for {"Graeme Dickenson" 3wrb}.
- Anything more regional than The Age can be challenged as hyper-narrow circulation. That won't count towards notability but the regional newspapers can be good for verifiability as long as they aren't just pushing out press releases and interviews with the DJ.
- (2) Do your citations as inline citations (footnotes). This requires citations (see point 1).
- (Bonus) Per WP:BLOG the use of blogs and self-published content is discouraged, with some exceptions. If Ringo praised the show on his own blog, I'd say cite it.
Find another cite like the Age, find a handful of smaller journalists, and edit them in as footnotes. I'm dubious, but I'm rooting for you. Oblivy (talk) 02:15, 21 April 2024 (UTC)