User talk:Novodobaski

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! ––FormalDude talk 15:05, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022

Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to a Wikipedia article appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 20:24, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

if you want to maintain the “natural point of view” you should include the other theory of their origin as well. They are 1st mentioned in 1444., in 1485 albanian translation of Ottoman defter we can see he albanised clearly slavic names, in some a bit more than 40 years they were already slavicised? Ok maybe sure, but Vasojevići belong to the branch E1b-V13> Z1057> Y30977> Y37092> Y126722, and some fraternities from Herzegovina and Bosnian Krajina are genetically close to them. There was also lastname Hercegović on that defter, also there is a tradition claiming they come from Herzegovina, i can provide a source fir that too. There are albanians in Herzegovina and Bosnian Krajina? Thats new to me, regardless, for the natural point of view why can’t we add that they atleast MIGHT be of serbian origin because story of them moving from Bosnia and Herzegovina to place near albanians and as consequence getting a bit albanized and then later de albanized doesn’t sound completely impossible to me but whatever, because site that I provided as a source has a LONG list of sources, and a site gives us genetic studies and historical mention but ok Novodobaski (talk) 21:08, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]