User talk:Ntronb

Welcome!

Hello, Ntronb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as David Darom, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of David Darom

The article David Darom has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article lacks reliable independent sources verifying this subject's notability, and I was not able to find appropriate sources to add with my own search.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:46, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your suggestions. I added 23 reliable references to the article. I hope that you agree to remove stop the delete process. I still don't know how to add pictures to the article. But plan to learn the procedure and to add some beutiful pictures. David Darom Is one the greatest photographer in Israel. (Ntronb (talk) 09:15, 22 December 2010 (UTC))[reply]

I looked, but I can't see any references you added that are to books, magazine articles, or newspaper articles about David Darom. Am I missing them? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Now I got it - I added book Davi Darom wrote and/or was the photographer, and you suggested to cite articles or papers about him.... mmmm...let me think about this and I'll find the right citations. Thanks again for the guiding - this is my firt time in Wiki as a writer :) Ntronb (talk) 18:52, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia requires that all information be independently verified. So what you should do is find the articles and books about Darom that verify the information in the article and cite those, then remove any remaining information that doesn't appear in any of the available sources. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:53, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi again - I have few questions: 1. Don't the books Darom created speak for themself? 2. There are three articles in English written about the importance of his work in three proffesional magazines - I'll add them 3. What about article written localy in Hebrew - is it valuable to add them too? 4. We plan to upload some pictures of Darom from the various fields of his interest will that be okay? Thanks,Ntronb (talk) 19:09, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

1. Information in an encyclopedia needs to be independently verified, because those things that are in his books but that no one has ever written about are probably not significant enough to go into an encyclopedia article. 3. Articles in Hebrew are fine, especially if they verify Darom's significance- I can't read them, but there are others at Wikipedia who can. 4. Be aware that you'll need to legally release the images under an appropriate license when you upload them, so only use photos that you own the copyright for. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:12, 22 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I am working on that - thanks again :) Ntronb (talk) 08:45, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I was working yesterday on a new article about a not-too-famous writer/artist, too- it's up at SARK (author). I made the list of works into a section in the article, rather than putting them in the references, which I think it easier on the reader. Notice that I only have a few sources listed, because I only ciited the ones I knew met the reliable sources criteria. I'm not much worried that it'll be tagged for deletion by new page patrollers, because I made sure to explain in what way she is notable, and included multiple articles about her in independent sources. It isn't long, because i only wrote what I found in those sources, but for a beginning, it isn't terrible- I can come back and make it better as I find more information. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 11:51, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there - again - good advices - I'll try to aply them in the text. Could you please write me how to fing your new article - I want to see how you did the list of works. Cheers,Ntronb (talk) 12:13, 23 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from David Darom. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 18:11, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to David Darom, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 18:36, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I think that I resolved the problems that the other pointed out: I removed advertisment content (pictures of the books and so on) I added internal link I asked Darom to review the paper I wrote - and tehrefore he edited the article after I wrote it I also asked him to upload to the public domain some of his beautiful photos - and so he did I believe that many Wiki reader will enjoy those nature photos Please remove the delete note :)Ntronb (talk) 19:57, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article David Darom, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. Teapotgeorge^Talk 16:54, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I don't agree with you! Did you realy read the article? I think it is not self promoting. I added one sentence with a specific reference. All the rest you have already corrected. I do not have any interest in promoting David Darom. I think you can now remove the banners - as they are not needed anymore. I did my last edit without beeing loged in (by mistake) I hope this didn't effect the authomatic reture of the bunners.Ntronb (talk) 17:08, 1 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited IRRESISTIBLE Raising youth awareness to Responsible Research and Innovation through Inquiry Based Science Education, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FP7. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:59, 9 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Irresistible (project)

The article Irresistible (project) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing Wikipedia:General notability guideline. If you disagree and deprod this, please explain how it meets them on the talk page here in the form of "This article meets criteria A and B because..." and ping me back through WP:ECHO or by leaving a note at User talk:Piotrus. Thank you.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. _{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 19:03, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]