User talk:OI-10-j.artetxe
Welcome!
Hello, OI-10-j.artetxe, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Ornithological park of mendijur, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Starting an article
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Ornithological park of mendijur
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Ornithological park of mendijur requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 03:14, 5 March 2011 (UTC)
The article Mendijur Ornithological Park has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This really isn't an article.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Safety Cap (talk) 20:51, 14 March 2011 (UTC)
- If you believe it shouldn't be deleted, please discuss in the article's talk page Safety Cap (talk) 17:45, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Mendijur Ornithological Park
[edit]A tag has been placed on Mendijur Ornithological Park, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hang on}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Safety Cap (talk) 18:04, 15 March 2011 (UTC)
Florida park
[edit]Older notices
|
|---|
A tag has been placed on Florida park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding
|
Hi,
Sorry you received all these warnings about your creation of Florida park which were mistakenly started by my premature tagging of the article as having no context when you were about to add details. I have collapsed them above to avoid littering up your talk page.
You were smart to add the {{under construction}} tag on the article, unfortunately nobody spotted that the SDPatrolBot was ignoring your good intentions and I failed to notice it on my watch-list otherwise a bit of common-sense would have avoided these unhelpful warnings. For future reference it takes someone other than the creator of the article to remove speedy deletion notices but if you are visibly working on an article and add a {{hangon}} notice, it is rarely an issue and will normally get removed the same day. I note you started the article as a user draft and it is a good idea to have a bit more work done on the draft before creating it as an article in order to avoid improvement notices or the risk of deletion while you are in the middle of working on it.
Please drop a note on my talk page if you need some help in the future, would like to discuss your articles or the problem you have had here further. Alternatively the {{helpme}} template is a good way of getting the attention of an available independent volunteer to help you with questions or problems. Thank you for your effort creating these interesting articles about Spain. Cheers Fæ (talk) 01:58, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
I added an infobox to your La Florida (park) article and included a new picture. I also added a couple of search links on the talk page that will help people find references for the article. Please feel free to change any of this stuff as I just added it to show others what could be done. Best regards. - Hydroxonium (T•C•V) 07:31, 18 March 2011 (UTC)
alert
[edit]Please do not add the inappropriate biographical material I removed on the people whose statues are in the park. It is already present in the articles on them. That's why we have links. DGG ( talk ) 21:26, 18 March 2011 (UTC)