User talk:Oaklandfunk
As a member of AA and NA I'm inclined to support your edited version of the paragraph. However it is true that AA literature points out that "only those with a drinking problem may attend closed meetings" and there is, at least at the AA meetings I've attended, a general feeling that drug addicts are unwelcome at closed AA meetings. I think the original author was trying to make the point that AA distinguishes itself from NA in that respect, rather than condoning drug use. Either way, I support your edit. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 23:16, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- The mediation case is still open and active at this link. The request was just moved to the talk page. -- OlEnglish (Talk) 01:05, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
The article Moshe Kasher has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ttonyb (talk) 19:56, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
The article Moshe Kasher has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. ttonyb (talk) 22:40, 18 December 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of File:Moshe Kasher at AOL BUILD.jpg[edit]
A tag has been placed on File:Moshe Kasher at AOL BUILD.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 19:22, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Am i incorrect in the idea that under the common usage agreement with getty images this image is covered under fair use on internet forums? I called today and thats what they said. Oaklandfunk (talk) 19:50, 3 August 2018 (UTC) oaklandfunk