User talk:Olliejulesb

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Olliejulesb, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Filing Flunky (talk) 10:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jean-paul maddou

The article Jean-paul maddou has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Scopecreep (talk) 09:28, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

Please do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from an article unless it contains at least one reliable source or was created before 18 March 2010, as you did with Jean-Paul Maddou. If you oppose the deletion of an article under this process, please consider sourcing the article or commenting at the respective talk page. Thank you. Scopecreep (talk) 08:37, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove Biographies of Living Persons prods from articles without addressing the issue, as you did with Jean-Paul Maddou. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the respective talk page instead. Thank you. Scopecreep (talk) 09:21, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jean-Paul Maddou with this edit, you may be blocked from editing. Shadowjams (talk) 09:36, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Jean-Paul Maddou. Shadowjams (talk) 09:40, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jean-Paul Maddou for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jean-Paul Maddou is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jean-Paul Maddou until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Shadowjams (talk) 21:49, 19 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

In response to your feedback

I do not see why he should to that, but by all means provide proof for your allegations.

Lectonar (talk) 08:45, 18 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

He's trolling apparently. I've never emailed him. Also see this. If this continues I'll bring it to ANI. Shadowjams (talk) 04:42, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

July 2012

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Calmer Waters 14:06, 16 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Olliejulesb (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i am a victim of online WIKIPEDIA abuse, i have tried creating a page for my late uncle (Jean-paul Maddou). Before i could even complete the page with references Shadowjams (who after looking at his page, acts without remorse and doesn't allow a first timer to wikipedia to try and finish a page. i will admit i have been a little immature by 'trolling' appareantly, but i only acted as this user has not allowed a fair chance for me to prove the existence of Maddou. I left a comment on his page asking why he has been attackling my account but the result has led to me being blocked. therefore i am requesting my ability to edit to be returned so i can add content to this encyclopedia, and is possible for shadowjams to not act so quickly without allowing those who have lives to edit over time (shadowjams makes over a few hundered edits a day) :O:O. Shadowjams if you do end up reading this then i will let you know that if you are after money i do not have it. but what i do have is a range of skills i have aquired over a long carrer, i want you to know that i will find you and i will perma-ban you. your so sincerely Abraham Lincoln. x Olliejulesb (talk) 11:18, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Even if talk page access hadn't been revoked I would have declined this as it clearly indicates at the end that the user is not at present likely to be able to work well with others. — Daniel Case (talk) 12:45, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have removed my decline, as I was the one who placed the original block in place. I have however disabled talk page access and that has been further been changed to include email. Calmer Waters 11:56, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]