User talk:Oltlfan2011

December 2011[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jessica Buchanan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not add extra clutter to the infobox when it is not needed. WP:SOAPS states that it is not needed. You are conflicting yourself when you write that a character is adopted and a half brother at the same time, so it creates more problems. Please rectifiy this. Rain the 1 05:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessica Buchanan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rain the 1 05:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Natalie Buchanan, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:SOAPS Rain the 1 05:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please read these help guides[edit]

Please treat the fictional character with the correct scope, there is no need for trivial info that resembles WP:FANCRUFT - You may gain a better understanding from MOS:FICTION. See WP:SOAPS for style guides on infoboxes, where it says that too much inuniverse information is discouraged by the members of the project. More specifics are based at Template:Infobox soap character.Rain the 1 05:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jessica Buchanan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Rain the 1 06:01, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The character is not dead in the real world, because she is fictional - you could have atleast took the time to read through the abopve, but obviously you think your way is more important than a consensus - I'd like to know why you think stating whether a character is dead or alive in the series has anything to do with their the relation to each character - more importantly - how are you helping the general reader by telling them this. Notable? Important? Encyclopedic? - Non of those really.Rain the 1 06:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Think about those worse off than you and I, who have trouble with their eyes - by including small text in an article: 1.) You are making it harder for them to read - 2.) You are making out that it is not important so can be made as tiny additional detail - which suggests it shouldn't be there at all. ...... Also, do not use full dates in infoboxes - use "1998-99" instead of "1998-1999".Rain the 1 05:08, 31 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

January 2013[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Sam Bennett (Private Practice) does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 04:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

March 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Livelikemusic. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Carly Corinthos, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 16:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Youtube[edit]

People do lie about their bio details. They also tweak Youtube videos. We need reliable sources. Materialscientist (talk) 03:45, 10 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

October 2015[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 02:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 22:46, 23 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please stop adding Twitter as a source for things? The links you keep adding cannot be used, especially when it includes claims of a third-party; as well, adding a barelink is against Wikipedia policy; it should be fully cited in proper citation format. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 03:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay I'm sorry...won't happen again.--Oltlfan2011 (talk) 05:37, 4 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Just reminding you to fully cite your sources, as one of your recent edits again featured a bare URL as a citation. livelikemusic ^{my talk page!} 22:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Once again, you're still adding bare URL's as sources. That is linkrot, and you must fully cite your sources. livelikemusic talk! 02:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Final time I am asking you to fully cite your sources; next time, I may take this to ANI, because it's becoming an issue. livelikemusic talk! 00:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016[edit]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. livelikemusic talk! 01:15, 6 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Hello, Oltlfan2011. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Oltlfan2011. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]

Hello, Oltlfan2011. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BLP issues and Arbitration notice[edit]

I'm not going to have that page fully protected for long, so if you intend on reverting again and continue to fail engaging on the talk page, you will become subject to Arbitration enforcement sanctions. Here is the pertinent template:

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

El_C 02:12, 20 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:14, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]