Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jessica Buchanan, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not add extra clutter to the infobox when it is not needed. WP:SOAPS states that it is not needed. You are conflicting yourself when you write that a character is adopted and a half brother at the same time, so it creates more problems. Please rectifiy this. Rain the 1 05:15, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jessica Buchanan. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Rain the 1 05:43, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Natalie Buchanan, you may be blocked from editing. Please read WP:SOAPS Rain the 1 05:44, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Please read these help guides
- Please treat the fictional character with the correct scope, there is no need for trivial info that resembles WP:FANCRUFT - You may gain a better understanding from MOS:FICTION. See WP:SOAPS for style guides on infoboxes, where it says that too much inuniverse information is discouraged by the members of the project. More specifics are based at Template:Infobox soap character.Rain the 1 05:48, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
- The character is not dead in the real world, because she is fictional - you could have atleast took the time to read through the abopve, but obviously you think your way is more important than a consensus - I'd like to know why you think stating whether a character is dead or alive in the series has anything to do with their the relation to each character - more importantly - how are you helping the general reader by telling them this. Notable? Important? Encyclopedic? - Non of those really.Rain the 1 06:08, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
Think about those worse off than you and I, who have trouble with their eyes - by including small text in an article: 1.) You are making it harder for them to read - 2.) You are making out that it is not important so can be made as tiny additional detail - which suggests it shouldn't be there at all. ...... Also, do not use full dates in infoboxes - use "1998-99" instead of "1998-1999".Rain the 1 05:08, 31 December 2011 (UTC)
Notice of discussion at the Administrators' Noticeboard
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your recent edit to Sam Bennett (Private Practice) does not have an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 04:25, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello, I'm Livelikemusic. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Carly Corinthos, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. livelikemusic my talk page! 16:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. livelikemusic my talk page! 02:36, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- Can you please stop adding Twitter as a source for things? The links you keep adding cannot be used, especially when it includes claims of a third-party; as well, adding a barelink is against Wikipedia policy; it should be fully cited in proper citation format. livelikemusic my talk page! 03:15, 4 November 2015 (UTC)
- Just reminding you to fully cite your sources, as one of your recent edits again featured a bare URL as a citation. livelikemusic my talk page! 22:40, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
- Once again, you're still adding bare URL's as sources. That is linkrot, and you must fully cite your sources. livelikemusic talk! 02:58, 3 February 2016 (UTC)
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)