Jump to content

User talk:Omar Faizel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hello, Omar Faizel! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Fainites barleyscribs 21:04, 28 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

Blocked

[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for apparent abuse of multiple accounts and violations of the biographies of living persons policy. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. MastCell Talk 22:31, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

not true

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Omar Faizel (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am a relatively new writer here and have not history as you seem to imply. I have not multiple accounts and havce not edited any biographies of living persons...so, what do I need to do to appeal this blocking of my account? Omar Faizel (talk) 19:06, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your activity at Advocates for Children in Therapy (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) makes it appear very likely that you are part of a sock- or meatpuppetry operation.  Sandstein  20:11, 29 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not True

[edit]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Omar Faizel (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Being blocked on appearances is just wrong. I feel the same way when stopped at the airport. I request an unblocking. If you don't want me to edit that particular article, while I think that sort of censureship is unfair, I will abide by it since I have other topics of greater interest to me. Thank you for attending to this request.

Decline reason:

I'm calling BS. Your edits are extremely similar to those by Didacticderivative (talk · contribs). I agree with the claim of sock puppetry by the blocking administrator. MuZemike 01:04, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Yes or no: Have you or have you not used multiple accounts to edit that article? Triplestop x3 00:51, 31 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No. Omar Faizel (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Omar Faizel (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I answered the question...there is just no basis for this, other than appearances, which is just wrong. I am not this Didact person, nor any other than me.

Decline reason:

Quack quack quack. Protecting page; you'll have to use the email list from now on -- Daniel Case (talk) 22:05, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.