Jump to content

User talk:Ouloul94

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Welcome...

Hello, Ouloul94, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.  Again, welcome! NiciVampireHeart 02:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

May 2011

[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Randy Orton, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. NiciVampireHeart 02:51, 8 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at John Morrison (wrestler), you may be blocked from editing. NiciVampireHeart 20:52, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning; the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Swagger, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NiciVampireHeart 20:54, 15 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Randy Orton, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NiciVampireHeart 06:42, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Zig Zag

[edit]

sorry dude, but the source for the Zig Zag says it's a bulldog, not a neckbreaker. Wikipedia goes by that. http://www.pwtorch.com/artman2/publish/TV_Reports_9/article_35422.shtml — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starship.paint (talkcontribs) 07:40, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

John Morrison

[edit]

I'm sorry, but Morrison's used Moonlight Drive, the running knee, and Nitro Blast as finishers in the past, so I am reverting your edit of removing them. In ECW, Morrison used the Moonlight Drive. Morrison used the Nitro Blast to pin Shaun Michaels and the running knee to pin Sheamus. All of which are backed up by the sources.

And the Flying Chuck is called the Flying Chuck. "The Shaman of Sexy took full advantage of Ziggler and Maria's disorder as he performed the Flying Chuck kick to seal the deal" http://www.wwe.com/shows/smackdown/archive/10092009/mainarticle

Starship.paint (talk) 14:10, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced info

[edit]

Please don't add unsourced information about wrestling moves. If it doesn't have a source, it will be removed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.29.245.31 (talk) 22:39, 6 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Finishers

[edit]

Please don't remove finishers or shift them to signature moves just because a few people have kicked out of them. For example, Kane's chokeslam is a finisher. He's finished many matches with that move, more than any other move. Just because he couldn't beat Taker with that move doesn't mean it's not a finisher. Also, old finishers are still finishers, despite them not being used any more. Starship.paint (talk) 03:50, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

[edit]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Before saving your changes to an article, please provide an edit summary, which you forgot to do before saving your recent edit to Randy Orton. Doing so helps everyone understand the intention of your edit (and prevents legitimate edits from being mistaken for vandalism). It is also helpful to users reading the edit history of the page. Thank you. Cognate247 (talk) 15:45, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing old finishers!

[edit]

You removed the Zack Attack and the DDT from Ryder's page. He did use them in the past and we have sourced info for that. Can you stop removing old finishers? Please. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Starship.paint (talkcontribs) 14:15, 23 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2011

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did at Mason Ryan, you may be blocked from editing. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 14:16, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Brodus Clay, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 14:17, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your recent edits

[edit]

I am in the process of reverting all of your recent edits which have either removed cited information or refactored cited information in a manner which contradicts the reference. Kindly do not continue editing in this manner as it will result in a block.
At the top of this page an editor posted a number of internal links to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. May I suggest familiarising yourself with them as that could help prevent any future misunderstandings on appropriate editing. ŞůṜīΣĻ¹98¹Speak 14:33, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ouloul94 just doesn't understand the concept that old finishers should be listed on the articles even if they're not used any more. I doubt Ouloul94 even reads the talk page because I've posted on it enough times already. Starship.paint (talk) 02:06, 29 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. When you recently edited Ron Killings, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TNA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 24 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wresler biographies

[edit]

Check the styles guide next time before making such sweeping alterations please. Thanks. Papacha (talk) 13:28, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from John Cena. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.. Papacha (talk) 15:52, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I understand being bold and attempting to improve articles to your best ability, but you've been asked by myself and others to check the styles guide for these pages before making changes across the board. Please stop and discuss before deleting mass amounts of content. Someone's actually brought your edits to attention there if you'd like to review what others have said. Thank you. Papacha (talk) 15:54, 28 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

April 2012

[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Brock Lesnar. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. BarryTheUnicorn (talk) 15:36, 27 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Randy orton

[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing pls not again delete content which is cited and proofed like you did in the randy orton article with the punt kick.--Nakurio (talk) 14:56, 3 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked for 48 hours from editing, because of persistent unhelpful editing of various kinds, perhaps most commonly repeatedly removing sourced content without any explanation, but the messages above give other examples. I am surprised you were not blocked long ago, considering the number of messages you have received over a period of a few days short of a year, and the fact that you appear to have made no attempt to take the messages into consideration, and have certainly never replied to any of them. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions, but please bear in mind that Wikipedia is a collaborative project, and if you disagree with other editors then you need to explain why, and be wiling to discuss the issues. Individual editors ignoring other editors and editing as they see fit is not the way Wikipedia works. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

May 2012

[edit]
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for upon returning from a disruptive editing block, immediately resuming the exact same behavior that led to your initial block. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 16:19, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]