User talk:Starship.paint

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
This user is no longer very active on Wikipedia.


Yeah, I'd be interested in going for that. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) #GG (talk) 10:08, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

I'm free. One question: how do I get involved in the creation stage, since that apparently is the easiest bit to screw up in this thing? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) #GG (talk) 07:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
Sure thing. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) #GG (talk) 08:13, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
I copied the expansion thing from WP:FOUR#Collaborations just to be sure that I got in on the article creation stage. It can go now. But yeah, the article's starting to look pretty good. I'm with you on the J.R. hook, sounds like the way to go. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) #GG (talk) 11:59, 9 May 2015 (UTC)
I'm not really familiar with the DYK process, so could you explain the QPQ thing? How would you provide it if I nominated the article? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 01:31, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
I haven't reviewed anyone so how could I nominate the article? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 01:39, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
If you have the QPQ, shouldn't you just make the nomination and say it's a co-nomination/co-creation just so we don't get shot down instantly when they see that I don't have a QPQ. You also know how these DYKs actually work. I've gotten all my previous DYK credits without making any nominations myself or taking any part in any of the discussions. I'll jump in when they have any questions or comments about the DYK. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 09:30, 10 May 2015 (UTC)
The name is mentioned for example here (盟友タッグ) and here. It can be incorporated into the article once we start writing the storylines/event sections. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 11:47, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
I'll be concentrating on the storylines and aftermath sections as I feel those are my strong suit. Are we doing all sections in the next part and not "saving" them for the final part? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 03:31, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
I've written the first version of the storylines section. You're a veteran of this good article thing, so I'm all for you making any edits or voicing any concerns about the section. Same with pictures, I added two, but these can be moved around when you're done with the event section and know which ones you want to use there. I've tried to keep the Japanese sources to an absolute minimun, using them only when I couldn't find the same info in English. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (talk) 16:39, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
I was actually thinking about cutting all the title matches apart from the IWGP Tag Team Championship and IWGP Heavyweight Championship, since those have absolutely no storyline behind them at all, just some challenges, and since the section's name is "storylines". How do you feel about that? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 13:45, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
There's not much I could add to the other title match storylines. Omega made his first after signing a contract, had no prior storyline with Taguchi, did not earn his title shot anywhere. Taguchi for the past months had been involved a separate feud with Suzuki-gun. Ishii had no interaction with Makabe, who came out of nowhere to challenge for the title, having been involved in the Bullet Club storyline the past months. Ibushi also came out of nowhere to challenge Nakamura. He had just become a heavyweight, before getting injured and this was his return match. The IWGP Jr. Tag title is just an afterthought, it's always the same three/four teams in the title match with no real storylines ever. Bullet Club, meanwhile, is one of THE acts in NJPW, while absolutely not because of Yujiro, Fale or Jarrett, but I thought Jarrett's involvement in the match would justify this. The Suzuki-gun storyline also explains Pro Wrestling Noah's involvement and led to the whole Noah invasion storyline, which is one of the year's biggest puroresu storylines. The Naito/Styles thing should go, since I added that just to cover all the matches. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 14:24, 28 May 2015 (UTC)

The only thing that struck me was the "Out of Time" name for one of the Time Splitters' move. I can't find it in the sources (they mention moonsault/neckbreaker combo) and the move's actual name is "Outatime", presumably after the license plate of the DeLorean from Back to the Future. Other than that minor thing, it looks good to me. I'm also pretty much done with aftermath section. There's some bits I could add, most notably about Alex Koslov, but don't want to make it too long. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 12:03, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

We could remove Suzuki-gun and/or Bullet Club from the storylines section if you want to, but I would wait for the actual FA review to see how they feel about its length. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 17:49, 11 August 2015 (UTC)

Yes. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 12:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

If that's what it takes, then I guess that's how it's gotta go. Although I'd prefer to get it done as soon as possible, I'm in no particular hurry. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 09:06, 9 September 2015 (UTC)

Yeah, I noticed that yesterday. I checked a few links on the Internet Archive and they seem to be there for the most part. I'll archive the ones on my watchlist later today. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen) (LOLTNA) 07:52, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

If by "MITB 2011" you mean Wrestle Kingdom 9, then yes. I'm good to go. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 12:20, 30 November 2015 (UTC)


Hi there! I just wanted to let you know that today's featured article is Money in the Bank (2011)! Congratulations and keep up the good work! Thanks! Ikhtiar H (talk) 12:05, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

I've been busy outside of Wiki lately so I missed seeing the article finally become a FA. About time, congrats! I'd give you another barnstar but I've already given you two!LM2000 (talk) 00:39, 15 June 2015 (UTC)
Cheers! InedibleHulk (talk) 12:44, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
I don't think so, but thanks. It's back in the article now. Somebody moved it aside for a TAKA Michinoku pic. Shouldn't happen twice. InedibleHulk (talk) 12:58, July 10, 2015 (UTC)
No, that's alright, too. Will probably have an RfC in the near-enough future. If you have an opinion on the matter, you could share it then. InedibleHulk (talk) 12:54, July 11, 2015 (UTC)
Like Cena, its time is now. But also like Cena, feel free to boo or cheer. "People Power", and all that. InedibleHulk (talk) 16:33, July 17, 2015 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Black Lives Matter[edit]

Ambox warning blue.svgTemplate:Black Lives Matter has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 23:03, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Triplemania XXII[edit]

First of all, thank you for your work on the Triplemania article I am glad to see someone else work on the Lucha articles, maybe in return I should work on a Japanese wrestling article after I am done with my Triplemania work ;-) I found something that could help give you a little detail for the event section if you need it -ía-xxii.html - it's the official AAA event recap, which yes is a primary source but it is not like anything in there is contentious, I figured it may just give you a few more details to work with.  MPJ -Fiesta Triplemania  03:13, 13 July 2015 (UTC)

  • That is kinda weird timing because that is actually what I was doing... are you watching me? ;-)  MPJ -Fiesta Triplemania  03:25, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @MPJ-DK: - unfortunately it is in Spanish... Google Translate is not foolproof - Konnan appears SOCIETY / Puppy says he is too big to bring his dad. I will next a closer look in the future. starship.paint ~ KO 04:47, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @MPJ-DK: - I'm almost done with the article, all that is left is to trawl through Medio Tiempo. I can't expand the Reception section more unless Medio Tiempo produces something, though. Plus the Gladiators website is dead. starship.paint ~ KO 02:31, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
  • Man that sucks, I hope it's temporary or I'll have a slew of dead links in IWRG articles to deal with. The article is looking really great too, thank you.  MPJ -Fiesta Triplemania  02:47, 16 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @MPJ-DK: - I'm done with the article, gone through Medio Tiempo. You can use for the Gladiators. starship.paint ~ KO 06:00, 22 July 2015 (UTC)
  • @Starship.paint: actually it was back up like yesterday or the day before so the real thing is available now. Thank god or I would have had a ton of dead links to deal with. MPJ -Viva Esfinge  11:53, 22 July 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 23[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Cena, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Five Knuckle Shuffle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:24, 23 July 2015 (UTC)


You left a message on my talk page months ago about tag reigns. I've been away because of college. I don't remember replying to you so I came by to drop you a line. --WillC 01:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)

  • @Wrestlinglover: - thanks for replying ... but I can't remember what the discussion was pertaining to now. So don't worry about it! However, since you're back, GaryColemanFan has an FAC on Money Inc, and I have a peer review on WK9 (for future FAC, or you could comment when it does come to FAC). starship.paint ~ KO 02:08, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
    • I'll be around for the moment. Got some free time, figured I'd work on old projects.--WillC 04:23, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
      • @Wrestlinglover: - thanks and good luck with them! starship.paint ~ KO 05:12, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
        • I found your peer review for the dome show. Left some comments. Good work. Nice to see someone praising my work a bit with Lockdown and Turning Point. Thanks. Although, for your best interest don't stand by Lockdown too much. I re-did it a couple of years ago to look more like Turning Point. Not exactly FA approved but in name only. My attempt to make sure it didn't get demoted any time soon.--WillC 08:43, 5 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thank you for my first ever barnstar! - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:38, 7 August 2015 (UTC)

Wrestle Kingdom 9[edit]

  • @Miniapolis: - thank you so much for your extensive copyedit. Your hard work is greatly appreciated. Although, I have a dispute with the removal of the nicknames of moves in the Event section. As such, most of the moves only have their technical names remaining (like kick-brainbuster combination losing the Chasing the Dragon name). Are you strongly opposed to these nicknames? Because fans who watch will definitely be more familiar with move nicknames (called by commentators) than technical names which are not always mentioned. starship.paint ~ KO 13:06, 11 August 2015 (UTC)


Can you redirect each event on WWE Insurrextion and thanks Mostafa Elsherbini (talk) 23:26, 30 August 2015 (UTC)

  • @Mostafa Elsherbini: - I don't understand - what do you want me to redirect each article to? Do you mean create individual articles for each event? starship.paint ~ KO 00:38, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

yes — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mostafa Elsherbini (talkcontribs) 13:26, 31 August 2015 (UTC)

  • @Mostafa Elsherbini: - sorry but the answer is no. 1) I wasn't watching WWF/WWE then, I've never even heard of this annual event before you mentioned it, I don't have the knowledge. 2) I don't have the time to do it. 3) I'm not interested in doing it. starship.paint ~ KO 13:49, 31 August 2015 (UTC)


Hi. I need a favor. I had a dicussion in the Template:WWE Personnel and the template was fully protected. However, it was protected a wrong version. I need to open a request, but it's to hard for me (languaje skills, too complex) Can you open the request? User:Wrabbjr902 put all injuried wrestlers as unassigned and some Main Roster wrestlers as NXT wrestlers. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:49, 5 September 2015 (UTC)

I had no choice but protect "the wrong version". But whatever is on the template should be backed up by sources found at List of WWE personnel. --wL<speak·check> 04:03, 6 September 2015 (UTC)
  • @WikiLeon: - no worries, I don't blame you. Sorry if I somehow came off that way. All's well that ends well. starship.paint ~ KO 08:17, 7 September 2015 (UTC)


Sorry about not reviewing wrestle kingdom. It slipped my mind. If you re-nominate it I certainly will be the first to review it.--WillC 15:43, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

  • @Wrestlinglover: - how free would you be in December? starship.paint ~ KO 00:39, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
    • I honestly couldn't even tell you if I'll be active on here in December. I only come on here for a while before getting distracted. I'm surprised I'm still around this time. Just have to see what happens come December. I think I'll be around. Probably going to be in the cup.--WillC 05:03, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
  • When you renominate it I will review it. Just drop me a line and if I see the message, regardless of whether I'm active or not I will review it.--WillC 05:26, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

Please help me![edit]

User:Wrabbjr902 has vandalized Template:WWE personnel on more than one occasion and has violated the 3RR rule. I've already reverted it twice and I even said I wasn't going to edit war with him, but he wants to anyway. He's already been warned by other users, but he blanks his talk page as a response. Can you please help me? -Keith Okamoto (talk) 05:12, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

  • @Keith Okamoto: I'm thinking of something. Prefall helped you out. Did you have an old username, by the way? starship.paint ~ KO 07:33, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
Yes, I was Mikeymike2001 but I changed it. Thanks for helping. -Keith Okamoto (talk) 13:34, 13 September 2015 (UTC)


There is no need to hide any of his filmography JMichael22 (talk) 20:01, 23 September 2015 (UTC)

His IMDB shows all the episodes for the show a source shouldn't be needed for each one JMichael22 (talk) 00:08, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

Never happened before[edit]

I've always wondered if this would happen but I never expected it too. Long time ago, about 6 years I think, I found out how to make a personal signature. I went through alot of versions, with colors, links, phrases (Joe's gonna kill you), etc. I finally settled on WillC since my name is William Chaudoin and I liked the idea of WillC since it sounds like "We'll See". Sounded sarcastic to me. Then one day about 4 years ago I think I ran across another user, User:WillC. I always wondered if his account and my signature would get confused and not until now has that occurred. To answer your question, I didn't write that article and I've never done a bio. Only non-wrestling articles I ever considered expanding was Transformers: Beast Wars, Disturbed (band) albums, Punisher related items, and TNA Impact! (video game) (though wrestling it is a game primarily). You may consult him, he/she may be of help.--WillC 05:46, 24 September 2015 (UTC)

It looks like User:Gloss did Josh Hutcherson. They do good work, I think they reviewed one of my GANs one time. Helpful person all the times I've dealt with them. Not sure how you thought I did it though.--WillC 05:50, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
It is fine with me. I just figured you got me confused with him. I kept thinking one day someone is going to mix the two of us up.--WillC 05:55, 24 September 2015 (UTC)
You got a FB or something?--WillC 08:51, 10 November 2015 (UTC)

DYK for Luis Fernandez-Gil[edit]

Gatoclass (talk) 19:02, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Award 4 U[edit]

Vjmlhds (talk) 00:42, 9 October 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:John Morrison 2010.jpg[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:John Morrison 2010.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 10:45, 17 October 2015 (UTC)


Hi. I'm sorry to disturb you again. It's about user Funkatastic. Do you think he has bad behavior and makes personnal atacks? Every time I talk into the tal page, looks like he's attacking me or mocking my opinion. He only says I gave my opinion without arguments. I gave my arguments and he says I'm not cooperating to find a consensus. I'm very burned with him. What do you recomend me?--HHH Pedrigree (talk) 21:10, 26 October 2015 (UTC)

Ben Carson[edit]

Hi, I see you've been active on the Carson article. I'd appreciate your help/advice re: the large credibility section I added. Lahaun (talk) 03:40, 8 November 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for your note. At least for the time being, Carson is no longer a surgeon or even a very well paid self-promoter, he's a presidential candidate and, as such, his credibility is of significant importance. And, more than any other 2016 candidate, Carson's appeal to voters is based largely on his personal narrative, his life story as told by him. If that story is false, his viability as a candidate and self-promoter collapses. The fact that Carson is receiving fast and furious media attention about mostly nothing other than his credibility reinforces the notion that his credibility is key to his overall biography. If he withdraws as a candidate, then, maybe the article can be revised, but until then, I think his credibility warrants a level 2 section. Lahaun (talk) 18:33, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

Merger discussion for The Shield (professional wrestling) [edit]


An article that you have been involved in editing—The Shield (professional wrestling) —has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Heytherehowsitgoin (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi! I saw you on the talk page for The Shield (professional wrestling) and ask for your support to merge Roman Reigns and Dean Ambrose to The Shield (professional wrestling). You can see my reason at the section on the talk page. Heytherehowsitgoin (talk) 00:47, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 13[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ultima Lucha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rey (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:10, 13 December 2015 (UTC)

Reference errors on 16 December[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


Thanks for the support. I should be reviewing Wrestle Kingdom tonight. I think I have some extra time finally.--WillC 00:16, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

You got a facebook or something?--WillC 23:06, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
  • How can I contact you there? starship.paint ~ KO 03:08, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
  • Happy New Year. I suddenly came down with a cold. I'll check the FAC when I'm better.--WillC 07:29, 1 January 2016 (UTC)

Happy Yuletide[edit]

Snowman drawing.svgHappy Yuletide! Snowflake.svg

Merry Yuletide to you! (And a happy new year!)

Rhoark (talk) 00:29, 24 December 2015 (UTC)

The Shield[edit]

So, hello Starship (can I call you just Starship?). I see that you're semi-retired but there seems to be a conflict with the page about the pro wrestling group the Shield again (I know), and it would be great to see you weight-in in the talk page.--EdgarCabreraFariña (talk) 02:00, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

That IP user reverted your edit.--Keith Okamoto (talk) 04:40, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Thank you[edit]

Thanks for keeping The Shield (professional wrestling) article in tact. I, along with you and others are reverting many edits that are obviously incorrect about the current state of the members of the group. Thank you. Heytherehowsitgoin (talk) 06:12, 29 December 2015 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Big Show and Kane.JPG[edit]


A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Big Show and Kane.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:48, 2 January 2016 (UTC)


Hi. Thank you so much. Happy new year too :) BTW, I'll like you see this video :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:36, 4 January 2016 (UTC)

Roman Reigns 2016[edit]

The Persona and reception section of Roman Reigns is too much extensive. I would prefer only keeping the persona contents and omitting the public reactions. If the abated information appears to be very less, the whole section should be removed. What are your thought regarding that? Currently, I am working on it to be a good article (I had read the criteria). Thanks. Ikhtiar H (talk) 07:12, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

  • @Ikhtiar H: - I disagree with omitting the public reactions ... the rejection of a top babyface by the audience definitely should be included. Others have raised the idea of merging the section into the History section, which can be considered... starship.paint ~ KO 10:06, 15 January 2016 (UTC)

semi-retired LOL[edit]

Yea so you are only spending time harassing me? Let's just start now... try to take this one down...

--Potguru (talk) 06:05, 4 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016[edit]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)


I noticed your recent edit to Tay (bot) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 14:04, 26 March 2016 (UTC)

Tay (bot) has been nominated for Did You Know[edit]

March 2016[edit]

Information icon Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing an article on Wikipedia, you will see a small field labeled "Edit summary" shown under the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)


I noticed your recent edit to Tay (bot) does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks! RezonansowyakaRezy (talk | contribs) 18:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)

DYK for Tay (bot)[edit]

Updated DYK query.svg On 8 April 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Tay (bot), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that within a day of the release of the Microsoft chatterbot Tay on Twitter, it was taken offline because it started making inflammatory tweets? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Tay (bot). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, daily totals), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 13:42, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

Precious anniversary[edit]

Two years ago ...
Cornflower blue Yogo sapphire.jpg
ultimate warrior
... you were recipient
no. 826 of Precious,
a prize of QAI!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 06:03, 15 April 2016 (UTC)


No, that's not from the printed Observer. That's actually a quote from Meltzer from the May 2 Wrestling Observer Radio. You can listen to it here: (55 minutes in). リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 09:51, 4 May 2016 (UTC)

I'm not really that well versed in the ins and outs of FA reviewing. I've never done it before, but I could look around if I see anything where I could give pointers especially if they're offering a review-for-review. Anyway, I'm ready for another go at the WK9 FA. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 10:51, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Yup. Let's hope third time's the charm. リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 06:09, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Reigns' reception[edit]

Hi Paint. I have a question. Do you think the Reigns reception it's a little bit long? I mean, the section is long as his WWE career. I feel is overdetailed. What do you think? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2016 (UTC)

  • @HHH Pedrigree: - do you think the problem will be solved by merging with the Career section? starship.paint ~ KO 00:59, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
    • Well, it's my opinion, maybe you don't see any problem. I think the reception section is perfecto. However, I think it's not necessary to include every reaction he had in every raw. I know talking about Reigns is juicy and people like Metlzer, the Torch, usually talk about him and his reception... but I feel we included too much. We include he is booed in every PPV. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 01:08, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
      • @HHH Pedrigree: - so are you saying that we should keep the Reception section but shorten it? starship.paint ~ KO 01:30, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
        • Yes. I love reception/legacy section, but include every reaction he had in every PPV... I think its too much. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 01:48, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
          • Okay. I'll work on cutting it down when I'm done with Damien Sandow. starship.paint ~ KO 01:49, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
            • @HHH Pedrigree: - can you check now? I feel like I have cut quite a lot. The section is also about his character, not just his reception... starship.paint ~ KO 05:07, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

I think the section looks much better. Thanks :) --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 16:22, 9 May 2016 (UTC)

Emma and Dana Brooke[edit]

However the sources already said with Dana Brooke or Emma, how is managing consider for you?TheBellaTwins1445(talk) 9:48, May 16, 2016 (UTC)

  • @TheBellaTwins1445: - when members of tag teams or stables (two or more active wrestlers) support each other at ringside, it might not be managing. Ambrose ringside when Rollins and Reigns wrestled. Kalisto ringside when Sin Cara wrestled. Barrett ringside when the rest of the League wrestled. In these controversial cases, the higher standard of a source saying "Dana is the manager of Emma" or "Emma is managing Dana" is needed in the sources. Just because Emma is at ringside at NXT TakeOver: Respect does not make her a manager. Just because Dana comes out with Emma on an episode of NXT and stays at ringside does not make her a manager either unless the source says so. starship.paint ~ KO 02:52, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

Primo & Epico[edit]

This page was moved again. Can you have it moved back, please? - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 04:20, 17 May 2016 (UTC)

The page was put back again. Can you put it back to Primo & Epico? - Kiraroshi1976 (talk) 23:05, 21 May 2016 (UTC)


Hi, Paint. I have a question. I saw you thanked my edition at Rhodes article, removing strange nicknames. I'll be honest, I'm really piss. Every time, I see a new "nickname" in the nicknames section, just because the wrestler or the commentarist called him one way or another. For example, AJ Styles, The Georgia Pitbull, The Blue Collar wrestler, A mastermind at innovative attacks... We're pretty fuck with Heyman and Wyatt promos. Do we have any method to include nicknames, not youtube videos? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 00:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

  • @HHH Pedrigree: - usually nicknames should come from text in WWE usually capitalizes nicknames "The Big Dog". If YouTube videos are used, we don't know if it is a nickname or a description. So if writes it, it is good. starship.paint ~ KO 01:20, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
    • So, for example, what do you think about EC3? I removed some nicknames but an IP said these are "real" nicknames... --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 01:52, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
      • @HHH Pedrigree: If commentators continually call EC3 a certain nickname, then it should be quite legit. Commentary is representing the company after all. Go ahead and remove those that have unreliable sources per WP:PW/RS, like WrestleZone or I think some of those nicknames are legit though. I'll try to help. starship.paint ~ KO 02:13, 25 May 2016 (UTC)

2016 Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Community Survey[edit]

The Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation has appointed a committee to lead the search for the foundation’s next Executive Director. One of our first tasks is to write the job description of the executive director position, and we are asking for input from the Wikimedia community. Please take a few minutes and complete this survey to help us better understand community and staff expectations for the Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director.

  • Survey, (hosted by Qualtrics)

Thank you, The Wikimedia Foundation Executive Director Search Steering Committee via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:49, 1 June 2016 (UTC)

It's all good[edit]

No reason to be sorry for reverting my edit. If I'm wrong I'm wrong it's all good. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 16:19, 9 June 2016 (UTC)


Nuvola apps edu languages.svg
Hello, Starship.paint. You have new messages at MediaKill13's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for June 21[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited SMS Körös, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Scuttle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 21 June 2016 (UTC)

Article for deletion[edit]

I could use your input on this matter View AfD Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 06:21, 23 June 2016 (UTC)

Check this out[edit]

So check this out I just reported user Danratedrko cause he has been warned Numerous times on his talk page by myself and others in the past month. Yet continues to remove content he doesn't like with no real reason to remove, personally attacks users who change or revert his removals, and is now edit Waring with me. Judging from his contribution history he has been attacking users all aver the place for months. I cant change anything back he has screwed up on Wrestlemania 32 now cause Im on my 2nd revert on each of his changes.

Admin it was reported to

Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 22:14, 24 June 2016 (UTC)

Im back and...................[edit]

Couldnt stay away lol.............Anyways I am already past my 3rd revert on List of WWE_World Heavyweight Champions IPS and new users keep chaging the name on it and I cant do anything about it, pretty sure there are no sources to back up the changes. shows WWE World Heavywieght Championship. Pretty sure im gonna get a ban after changing back it so many times. Admin locked it down for a few days and reverted it back. I let the admin know I broke the rule and if i need to be blocked i wont fight it. Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 04:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

  • @WarMachineWildThing: I looked at your edits and I think they are justified. These pages are just vulnerable to unsourced and well-meant edits. starship.paint ~ KO 08:31, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

I think we might......[edit]

I think we might have to get an admin involved in the Mr mcmahon deal.Shinkazamaturi keeps changing it even after a 3 to 1 vote for it to stay Vince not Mr, thoughts?? Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 05:25, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

Admin already saw what he said and did, they said he changes it again he's blocked.Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 05:49, 29 June 2016 (UTC)

I think acknowledgement would be good. But not changing it everywhere. I don't know anymore getting kinda to the point where I just need to step away from all of this Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 17:51, 1 July 2016 (UTC)

Chris "WarMachineWildThing" is wrong. He also badly change the shield's accomplishment. For example, Adding WWE world title, Intercontinental title, Money in the Bank and Royal Rumble winning.--Shinkazamaturi (talk) 03:52, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

Wasnt gonna reply to this as I'm taking a break from WIKI at the moment but since it's a lie..... First off Ummmmm I never added any of those accomplishments to The Shield article NOT ONE, Which now makes you a liar and a troublemaker,Now I have in the past reverted edits which removed them from the article but that was before I noticed the memo on the article about nothing being added prior to Nov 2012 and After June 2014 after Starship pointed it out, then I removed them anytime they were added back and helped explain the memo better on the article so it was less confusing which I was thanked for by Starship, but I never added any of them to the article, others added them. As a matter of fact I removed the NXT title off of the article because I misread it to which I reverted myself and put it back. There is NOT one history log for The Shield that would show I EVER added any of the accomplishments you just accused me of adding to that article,they were added by others. So once again YOUR WRONG. Secondly you were not pinged by either Starship or I on this convo which means you are borderline WP: Harassment, Are you trying to get blocked or banned? Knock it off all your doing is making things worse for yourself and this is going to get you into nothing but trouble,LET IT GO,MOVE ON! Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 06:12, 2 July 2016 (UTC)

quite right[edit]

You are quite right, without the source review it would not have passed for FA yet, and I thanked him. Still not sure why people don't use google translate or other browser translators for foreign languages - there seems to be an aversion to those, which confuses me as I use them all the time and they're like 99% reliable.  MPJ-DK  11:23, 17 July 2016 (UTC)

Might wanna check this out[edit]

Not sure why it was ever nominated in the first place. Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2016 WWE draft Chris "WarMachineWildThing" (talk) 02:33, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Starship, I've greatly missed your precision-style takedowns in discussions. It was great to see that again in the IC title discussion.LM2000 (talk) 23:10, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

WWE roster[edit]

Hi. Can you help us? Since the Draft, Vjmlhds and I have different opinions (again) about the WWE Roster article. He want to change the format, I prefer to use the old one. Can you give us your opinion at the talk page? --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:23, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Wrestle Kingdom 9[edit]

Hi -- sorry to see that Wrestle Kingdom 9 failed for lack of reviews again. I'll keep an eye on it and if you renominate I'll be glad to support again. Best of luck. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 08:51, 22 July 2016 (UTC)

  • @Mike Christie: - thank you for support. I'll ping you when it's up again. Cheers! starship.paint ~ KO 13:48, 22 July 2016 (UTC)
    • Hi Starship, re. this, we normally only waive the two-week rule when noms have received little or no commentary. OTOH I realise that for the last few weeks of its life this one was in a similar situation and there were no outstanding issues when it stalled. So okay, go for it, but suggest leave it till after the weekend as we usually clear a few from the FAC list just before the start of a new week, and if you're notifying previous reviews it's up again you may as well do that at the start. Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 03:11, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

It looks like you are about to have another FA.--WillC 06:42, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

  • @Wrestlinglover: - really, thank you! :) With how hard it is to get FA on these articles, it's not very likely I'll try again. All the more I appreciate your help! starship.paint ~ KO 10:20, 18 August 2016 (UTC)

Looks like our little 15-month project is finally over. Now all that's missing is our WP:FOUR recognition. You gonna get the ball rolling for that? リボン・サルミネン (Ribbon Salminen)(ZOOM) 20:18, 19 August 2016 (UTC)


re Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Archive 93#The Magical Search Tool For Pro Wrestling Reliable Sources

That links to

I am wondering if it would be possible for us to code this as a template that users might conveniently link to on their userpages (I would like to) if they would like to do a search for references which they could use to support material without generating objections.

I believe there is a way we could code this based on template:google and in the source code have an aesthetic alphabetized list of anything at Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources#Official promotion websites or Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Sources#Websites proven reliable so that we could easily do a visual comparison of the sites in the template and the sites on the sources page to make sure all of them are listed.

For example as a start from what you listed:


TBA I notice:


I don't know if it's possible to site: for to limit to David Shoemaker's works in a search though. Actually that apparently redirects to now. His latest article makes me think if we had to include a URL it ought to be which I figure is the name of his column there. Ranze (talk) 03:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)

  • I'm quite busy these days and can't respond quickly. starship.paint ~ KO 04:32, 12 September 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open![edit]

Scale of justice 2.svg Hello, Starship.paint. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Remember what I said all those months ago?[edit]

Yeah, it didn't happen. [1] Sigh, c'est la vie. Banedon (talk) 08:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Extended confirmed protection policy RfC[edit]

You are receiving this notification because you participated in a past RfC related to the use of extended confirmed protection levels. There is currently a discussion ongoing about two specific use cases of extended confirmed protection. You are invited to participate. ~ Rob13Talk (sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC))

Wrestle Kingdom 9 for TFA[edit]

This is to let you know that the Wrestle Kingdom 9 article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 4 January 2017. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 4, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 01:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)