User talk:Pacificus07
April 2009
[edit]
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Catholic peace traditions, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Catholic peace traditions was changed by Pacificus07 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-04-27T15:04:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 15:04, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Catholic peace traditions. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Nsaa (talk) 15:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)
Catholic peace traditions
[edit]Much of the article Catholic peace traditions could be merged with Christian pacifism. I feel that it mixes up the notion of ecclesiastic tradition with the modern understanding of secular and political traditions. The end of the article is too focused on the local Church of the United States. It also fails to explain why American Catholics are sociologically no different from the average population in their support for various American campaigns of militarism. ADM (talk) 12:39, 29 April 2009 (UTC)
- I'm trying this for the first time, so please bear with me. The edits are of my own original posting here, made to avoid a conflict with a copyrighted piece I'll be publishing. Is that vandalism? I have to disagree with ADM on the major point: the Catholic tradition (which I've been publishing on for the past 25 years) does include all these strains. It does not "mix" ecclesiastical and secular, but in fact the synthesis is the very nature of Catholic traditions. Perhaps that can be brought out more clearly? What do you think? On the length of the modern North American section, you may be right. Let me consider some cuts there to bring it into proportion, and address your point that the differences with "average" American thought need to be brought out. Pacificus07 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)