User talk:Paigecm

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Paigecm, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 16:35, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Paigecm! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering

Feel free to drop by our website, make a profile and see how else you can participate!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 16:35, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Karen Lord

Hi, I'm SarahStierch. Paigecm, thanks for creating Karen Lord!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hi there. Great start on this article. It'd be great if you could replace the unreliable sources like WordPress and sites associated with Karen Lord with reliable secondary sources. Great start! :)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

SarahStierch (talk) 00:39, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, SarahStierch! I'm aware of the fact that WordPress is considered to be an unreliable source, but in this case, it's only referenced because it's Karen Lord's primary professional website. It is not used as a reference for any of the data (as far as I am aware) -- those citations are to secondary sources. What is the recommended procedure in these situations?

Talkback

Hello, Paigecm. You have new messages at SarahStierch's talk page.
Message added 06:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

SarahStierch (talk) 06:08, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Paigecm - I award you the Original Barnstar for your excellent contribution about Karen Lord. I hope you will continue to contribute and fight the good fight about women's coverage on Wikipedia, and about any other subject that interests you. Thank you for your contributions at expanding the world's free encyclopedia. SarahStierch (talk) 06:10, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]