User talk:Pascal2187

February 2021

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Philips Hue. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] MrOllie (talk) 12:55, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The links are not refspam. I used them to tell where I got the information from, a reliable source. Now you delete all the useful information and even the table with the information. Why do I do so much work to find external information, add it and then you delete it?

Pascal2187 (talk) 13:20, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Blogs and other self published sources are not sources used on Wikipedia. Repetitive addition of the same source is considered refspam, as Wikipedia defines it. Please use only reliable sources from now on. Thanks! - MrOllie (talk) 13:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Im very sure it's a reliable source in the Netherlands and it's not a personal blog. Please check what reference was used a year ago. I just edit the url because the content was moved to a new one. To react on "Repetitive addition of the same source is considered refspam", I used the same source because all the information I used came from that source on different pages. And what makes all the other reference a reliable source? And why you delete valuable information on the page too? Pascal2187 (talk) 13:49, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]