User talk:PerfectSvasthya

May 2023

Hello, I'm Illusion Flame. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you. - 🔥𝑰𝒍𝒍𝒖𝒔𝒊𝒐𝒏 𝑭𝒍𝒂𝒎𝒆 (𝒕𝒂𝒍𝒌)🔥 00:26, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been indefinitely blocked from editing because of the following problems: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business, organisation, group, or web site, which is against the username policy.

You may request a change of username and unblock if you intend to make useful contributions instead of promoting your business or organization. To do this, first search Special:CentralAuth for available usernames that comply with the username policy. Once you have found an acceptable username, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with your new username and replace the text "Your reason here" with your reasons to be unblocked. In your reasons, you must:

Disclose any compensation you may receive for your contributions in accordance with the paid-contribution disclosure requirement.
Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

Appeals: If, after reviewing the guide to appealing blocks, you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal it by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your reason here" with the reasons you believe the block was an error, and publish the page. Alexf^(talk) 00:27, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PerfectSvasthya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

nutrition.studies (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I have Ph.D. in Nutritional Biochemistry from United States. I intend to append nutrition related articles over Wikipedia with pre-clinical studeis published over PubMed database, and clinical trials published over Clinical Trials database. This is what I tried to do with my first edit and not realizing that it will be blocked. I do not receive any compensation for my nutrition studies reviews. I do understand the reason for my block and will stay limited to only the peer-reviewed published studies over academic or government databases. Going forward if I am unblocked, my contributions will be to extend nutrition facts with published studies over Wikipedia health and nutrition articles. PerfectSvasthya (talk) 00:57, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Editing about nutrition seems to squarely fall within your conflict of interest. Your website states that Ayurveda is involved, meaning that the contentious topic rules are triggered as well. We're(in my opinion) are going to want to see edits in other areas before permitting you to indirectly contribute in the area of your conflict of interest. 331dot (talk) 07:39, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PerfectSvasthya (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

nutrition.studies (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

And how are you going to see edits in other areas if I am still blocked. What's the final status on my two requests?

Decline reason:

This is not an unblock request. Please don't waste our time like this. If you aren't interested in editing outside of your conflict of interest, this is the end of the line. You will not be unblocked. That's a final statement. If instead you wish to write about areas not within your conflict of interest, tell us what you plan to write about instead and convince us you understand the problems with your prior edits. Yamla (talk) 10:07, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't have time to convince un-educated people like Yamla. You are not worthy of my education, expertise and experience. NOT interested in working with you anymore. End of line and don't waste my time anymore. PerfectSvasthya (talk) 17:09, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]