User talk:Peter Vogel

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from Son Goku (Dragon Ball). Please be more careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kariteh 22:02, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Son Goku (Dragon Ball)

Your edit to the page Son Goku (Dragon Ball) is appreciated. However, the information you added is useless for people who are not already interested in the topic. This is considered cruft. Please read this guideline. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 19:34, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Vegeta

It might not of been your intention but you have removed the now shortened plot summary from Vegeta. Please do not remove content like this without a good reason. Thank you. DBZROCKSIts over 9000!!! 19:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:FANCRUFT on Son Goku (Dragon Ball)

Peter Vogel, you should also read WP:NOT#INFO. That abilities list is useless, and it was said here and here that it was one of the things that should be cut and/or merged into a paragraph section. If you still feel the need for such a bunk list, leave a comment at WP:WPDB regarding it. Consider this as another "light" warning. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 23:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

September 2007

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Kariteh 08:45, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding your continued addition of WP:FANCRUFT

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to Son Goku (Dragon Ball), are considered vandalism and are immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 00:33, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Peter Vogel for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:56, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

accused

I am being accused of being you, Peter Vogel. You honestly know that I am not you right? --TimySmidge 18:30, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also accused

I too have been accussed of being you, which both you and me know I am not.--Lucky Mitch 19:43, 22 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Criminated

Peter voget, the user Sesshomaru is calling me sockpuppet of you, which I am not. Ken_shoryuken 16:03, 6 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

October 2007

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Bulma, you will be blocked from editing. AF US CO 01:09, 8 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merge discussion for Dragon Ball Z: The Tree of Might

An article that you have been involved in editing, Dragon Ball Z: The Tree of Might, has been proposed to be merged into another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going to the article, clicking on the (Discuss) link at the top of the article, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. --Pixelface (talk) 14:22, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]