User talk:Phil2334

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 21:53, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of 20 Greatest Heros and Villians

A tag has been placed on 20 Greatest Heros and Villians, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

a list of 'the greatest' anything according to one editor's opinion isn't notable, WP:SNOW

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. -- Darth Mike (join the dark side) 05:41, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide edit summaries

It is good practice to fill in the Edit Summary field, or add to it in the case of section editing, as it helps everyone to understand what is changed why it is changed, such as when perusing the history of the page. It's a good idea to set your user preferences (under Editing) to "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary". I used to not leave edit summaries, and was called out on it, and now I realize how useful they are. -- Darth Mike (join the dark side) 05:58, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Mickey Mouse. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Darth Mike (join the dark side) 06:18, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Mickey Mouse V.I.P. club

You've added a lot of statements that certain characters are members of the Mickey Mouse V.I.P. Club. Is there an official source to confirm this information? -- Darth Mike (join the dark side) 06:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Mickey Mouse, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. JForget 16:19, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to blank out or delete portions of page content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did to Mickey Mouse, you will be blocked from editing. -- Darth Mike (join the dark side) 18:07, 15 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Mickey Mouse, you will be blocked from editing. pablo_hablo. 22:03, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Mickey Mouse. Alansohn (talk) 22:15, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for violating the three-revert rule. You are welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below. Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 03:17, 19 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]