User talk:Philosophyfellow

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome to my talk page. Philosophyfellow (talk) 14:42, 3 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
HI, Welcome to wikipedia ...I don't know if I can help but I'm also working on Mr Sheldrake's biog and be aware certain people are watching your page and will soon write things on it, try and ignore or delete anything negative. Stay on topic on his talk page and edit small and neatly:) best wishes scary Veryscarymary (talk) 20:07, 15 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I notification[edit]

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Consensus by exhaustion at Rupert Sheldrake. Thank you. Mangoe (talk) 16:09, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to pseudoscience and fringe science. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Note that "activity" here includes talk page discussion. Mangoe (talk) 12:43, 19 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


quick typo alert[edit]

Hello Philosophyfellow, over on the Sheldrake talkpage you refer to "Lantresman" ... but their username is actually uppercase-letter-i for the first letter. Thanks for improving wikipedia, see you around. 74.192.84.101 (talk) 08:29, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

Are you Tumbleman (talk · contribs) in disguise? Barney the barney barney (talk) 22:14, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Your use of multiple Wikipedia accounts[edit]

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Tumbleman, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community. vzaak (talk) 06:50, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Another one bites the dust. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.139.22.141 (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration Request Notification[edit]

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests#Persistent Bullying of Rupert Sheldrake Editors and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, — Preceding unsigned comment added by Askahrc (talkcontribs) 20:10, 29 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Not too much point in that Askahrc (talk · contribs) as Philosophyfellow (talk · contribs) been blocked as a sockpuppet of Tumbleman (talk · contribs). Barney the barney barney (talk) 19:01, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]