User talk:Physboy21

This is Physboy21's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: Draft:Or Hen (physicist) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Or Hen (physicist). Thanks! Artem.G (talk) 17:54, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! I'll replay to it now. I'm the one who wrote the text that appear in EverybodyWiki. In fact, I wrote it here, they copied it, and then by mistake I deleted it here so the text they had there was a good 'backup'... Physboy21 (talk) 13:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Or Hen (physicist) (September 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ldm1954 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs to

meet any of the eight academic-specific criteria
or cite multiple reliable, secondary sources independent of the subject, which cover the subject in some depth

Make sure your draft meets one of the criteria above before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If the subject does not meet any of the criteria, it is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

With an H-factor of 39 he is moving in the right direction. However, he is not there yet for notability. I will add that many of the awards are not notable, and should be deleted.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Or Hen (physicist) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Ldm1954 (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Physboy21! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Ldm1954 (talk) 22:09, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Ldm1954, thank you for reviewing my submission! I wanted to ask about why he does not meet two of the eight academic criteria.

He's the elected chair of the Electron-Ion Collider Users Group. That's a big thing - its the next large particle collider the U.S. are building at few Billion $ investment. They include over 1400 scientists from around the world that elected Hen to lead us. I think that qualifies for criteria 6: highest-level elected post at a major academic society.
APS fellow is an honor awarded to less than 0.5% of the Society’s members (excluding students). I think the latter qualifies for criteria 3: elected fellow of a major scholarly society which reserves fellow status as a highly selective honor.
While I copied all of his awards from the CV I found online (agree I can delete the less important once), the Stuart J. Freedman Award and IUPAP Young Scientist Prize are both very big deal. Probably similar can be said about Sloan, the Guido Altarelli Award and being names a Amar G. Bose Fellow, that seems like a big deal in MIT, getting all of these is not a small feet!

Certainly Hen is 'young' to have received these recognitions, but that's exactly why I took the time to write this page for him. His CV shows over 150 invited talks and seminars, including plenaries in all major nuclear physics conferences, so he's very visible in physics. He's a *young( star in nuclear physics and I think that's exactly why he deserve this page.

I am happy to get your thoughts on how I can / should edit the page to make it a better fit?

Thank you! Physboy21 (talk) 21:14, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I realize that it is disappointing to get an article declined, just as it is disappointing to have a paper declined. You need to remember that professionals are reviewing these articles. Sorry, while an APS Fellow or Chair of a user group are important steps, they are not major. (Neither, for instance, is a Sloan.) These are standard expectations in academia. Notability is a significant step up from this. I don't think there is anyway you can edit the page, it is too early. Ldm1954 (talk) 22:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Or Hen (physicist)

Hello, Physboy21. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Or Hen".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 23:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]