User talk:Planhand

The violation of 3RR[edit]

You have already broken 3RR rule. FJcave (talk) 13:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It is not conflict 3RR. In order of the edit, Added the reference by.--Planhand (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

June 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Toilets in Japan has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 15:53, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I make an effort for constractive, through added the reference.--Planhand (talk) 15:58, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for violating Wikipedia policy, by edit warring. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by replying here on your talk page by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}}. You may also email the blocking administrator or any administrator from this list instead, or mail unblock-en-l@mail.wikimedia.org. Orderinchaos 16:01, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Planhand (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Add the reference meet the request of WP:RS and WP:V

Decline reason:

There are always consequences idf you fail to heed advice. The three revert rule is there for a reason.— Spartaz ^Humbug! 17:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have an objection for the block. I described the article and added the reference meet the request of WP:RS and WP:V. I require User:Orderinchaos's explanation more, or other user's review, about the block.--Planhand (talk) 16:17, 28 June 2008 (UTC) --Planhand (talk) 16:26, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Let me put it this way: People don't care if your sources are reliable when the information you insert is not pertinent. Therefore, instead of continually reinserting the information, you should make a proposition for it on the talk page to reach consensus to add. If you can't get that consensus, you don't add the info. --Blanchardb-^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}-timed 16:36, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added the information of the book below:

Osanai Michiko, Coffee of the daybreak on the wheelchair - Sexial feelings of the person with disability (車椅子で夜明けのコーヒー - 障害者の性, Kurumaisu de yoake no kōhī - Shougaisha no sei), NESCO (ネスコ, nesuko) / Bungeishunjū Ltd., 1995, ISBN 4-89036-891-4

is really confession and nonfiction of the real life of the person with disability (or handicapped or challenged person). NOT the stuff regard as novels or fiction. Besides, User:Blanchardb must be read below:

Wikipedia:Relevance of content is only essay, declared the head of WP:ROC, "It is not a policy or guideline, and editors are not obliged to follow it."

--Planhand (talk) 17:34, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't call it 3RR because it was up to about 20RR by the time I blocked. If a change is being resisted, it is probably best to take it to the talk page of the article and discuss it there. It goes without saying, too, that as this is your first edits to the encyclopaedia, you probably won't be able to avoid the fact your additions may be viewed with more scepticism than those of an established editor (see WP:SPA). However, this is all the more reason to try to justify what you are doing rather than simply go in and try to fight everybody. If you have a good point, people will ultimately accept it and help you. Orderinchaos 06:14, 29 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]