User talk:PleaseTryHarder

December 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for reverting your recent experiment. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox instead, as someone could see your edit before you revert it. Thank you. Sro23 (talk) 04:11, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Only you, The Fools, think I am consciously "trying", Muslim.

And you think you're ready to enter the first world.

Don't make me laugh, boy.

Try Harder, hmph. What am I? A Muslim?

Ha Ha. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 200.196.59.86 (talk) 04:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 04:49, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PleaseTryHarder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm seeing what I can edit. Not for the assumption above.

Decline reason:

Obviously trying to game our processes via junk edits. GAB^gab 05:44, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PleaseTryHarder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm allowed to see which articles I can edit with minor edits. Not "junk edits". I don't think I've done anything wrong. Harsh comments based on assumptions are not helpful. If you monitor my major edits (if allowed) they will prove otherwise.

Decline reason:

Nonsense.Any editor can edit any page, save only those pages which are protected. Was it your plan to make a minor change to every articles in the encyclopedia? If unblocked, what (sensible) edits do you want to make?--Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 11:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

PleaseTryHarder (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

In response to User:Anthony Bradbury. I wanted to edit Mission Impossible 6 article as there was no mention of Henry Cavill/Justice League reshoots that affected this production. I was unable to edit this, so checked if other articles of interest had the same edit issue. I did not vandalise them, therefore not sure why my actions are considered wrong. So please kindly unblock.

Decline reason:

There's no reason why editing Mission: Impossible 6 in the same way as all those other articles wouldn't have worked. Removing correct punctuation from articles clearly is making them worse; deliberately worsening articles is vandalism. Making test edits in live articles is disruptive in its own right, even if you reverted all those edits yourself (which you didn't). Huon (talk) 17:06, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Mission Impossible 6 has been edited 21 times this month with as far as I am aware no reported difficulty. It is not protected. might you have somehow done it wrong? --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 16:13, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Huon I think you'll find ALL minor edits by me were reverted by me. If you read my reason carefully you will find the Henry Cavill/Justice League info is missing. No intention of being disruptive. If you are an administrator then please unblock to enable the edit to Mission Impossible 6. Thanks. PleaseTryHarder (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Anthony Bradbury I don't know, I wasn't able to edit. Hence checking with other articles. If you are an administrator then please unblock so I can make the edit. My intention is not to vandalise or disrupt. Thanks. PleaseTryHarder (talk) 18:28, 29 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think I checked your edits thoroughly enough to be sure of my assessment. You didn't always revert yourself. Even if you had reverted yourself, the edits would still have been disruptive. Huon (talk) 01:30, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]