User talk:PlexiGH
This is PlexiGH's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: NHL 19 (August 8)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NHL 19 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NHL 19, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, PlexiGH!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SportingFlyer talk 13:04, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
|
An article you recently created, Twosday, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – Pbrks (t • c) 01:50, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Pbrks: I kind of took over this draft. What do you think about it? Total no-no or just no? Happy Twosday! twsabin 19:23, 22 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Twsabin: I'm not convinced that is passes WP:NEVENTS (or if that even applies to a single date), so I think I'll leave it to another editor to review the submission. – Pbrks (t • c) 00:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Pbrks: Thanks for the reply. I don't want to nag: One last look after expansion? Basically the subject is formulated as a notable fad, that would go in Category:2020s fads and trends. Standard is GNG not NEVENT. (Fads are defined by their transience, but they can still be notable, as examples demonstrate) twsabin 19:23, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Twsabin: I'm not convinced that is passes WP:NEVENTS (or if that even applies to a single date), so I think I'll leave it to another editor to review the submission. – Pbrks (t • c) 00:24, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Nomination of List of songs in the NHL video game soundtracks for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of songs in the NHL video game soundtracks until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
OceanHok (talk) 13:45, 8 April 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NHL 24 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.