User talk:Plymanarchy
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. August 2018
[edit]Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tudor Evans have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 15:42, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Tudor Evans. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 15:43, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Tudor Evans. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. The editor whose username is Z0 15:44, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at The Herald (Plymouth). CLCStudent (talk) 15:47, 16 August 2018 (UTC)