Jump to content

User talk:Pneman1880

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

March 2022

[edit]

Hello, I'm Mako001. I noticed that you made a change to an article, National Distributist Party, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:16, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

which part was this? The influence and policy? Just as I am the founder of the party you see haha. Pneman1880 (talk) 12:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
https://www.nationaldistributistparty.com/policies.html
This is the source for policy of the NDP from their/my website. Pneman1880 (talk) 12:20, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Hello, Pneman1880, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:35, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ah right, my bad, I will inform my friend to only allow me to make the edits now then too, cheers. Pneman1880 (talk) 12:41, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Also tell them that undisclosed paid editing is taken very seriously, and will likely result in a block if they do it again. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 12:43, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
they are not being paid to do it though? Also, where has the influence and policy segment gone on the page - I added a source straight from the NDP's website...
Thank you. Pneman1880 (talk) 12:45, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
It was deleted because it is a copyright violation. The entire article will be deleted soon anyhow, as it meets the criteria for speedy deletion. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:06, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I'd recommend that you both get familiar with the content policies before trying to write the draft again. Please do not recreate it as an article, instead make it in the "Draft" namespace. Mako001 (C)  (T)  🇺🇦 13:08, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
May I ask how it was a copyright violation if I am the holder of the said website and intellectual property? I will allow the other creator to publish the wikipedia page and have sent an email regarding the copyright too. I am guessing it will just be kept as a draft then until a certain time or what? I just don't understand why I couldn't create a page about the NDP from a non-bias perspective, as that is what it was - a page that stated the parties stances, the influences on the party and alliances we have. The alliances with other notable distributist groups are true, but how am I going to reference an email without breaking privacy laws. Pneman1880 (talk) 13:18, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asparagusus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Asparagusus (interaction) 13:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Pneman1880! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Asparagusus (interaction) 13:27, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hello there, I am just wondering how the article could be rewritten to ensure that it is published? I understand that peacock terms are one, but regarding the references, they are from secondary sources that are more than reliable and historical. Thank you. Pneman1880 (talk) 14:52, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wikieditor019 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Thanks, Wikieditor019 (If I do not respond, please visit my talk page) 18:20, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]