User talk:Poo88nugget

December 2007[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Silver Creek, New York, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:51, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What's up?[edit]

You appear to be using a tool intended for repairing vandalism to randomly revert edits. Can you explain your recent edits? They are confusing to me. In fact, they are so confusing that I've blocked you while I take a minute to look at them more closely. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:53, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked indefinitely because it is a blatant violation of our username policy - it is obviously profane, attacks or impersonates another person, or clearly suggests that your intention is not to contribute to the encyclopedia (see our blocking and username policies for more information). We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but users are not allowed to edit with inappropriate usernames and trolling or other disruptive behavior is unacceptable.

I was in the wrong tool; I was in "all recent changes" rather than "filter recent changes" I didnt read the revisions I was reverting and now realise that I made a mistake. Sorry. Poo88nugget (talk) 17:46, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even in 'filter recent changes,' you should never revert an edit without reading it. After all, many edits are good and useful. Just look at the recent changes and revert those that are obvious vandalism. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

yes i understand now i misunderstood what the filter actually did, i think it filtered just bad edits, sorry. Poo88nugget (talk) 15:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Poo88nugget (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

misunderstood use of tools

Decline reason:

You have been blocked because of your offensive username, not because of your edits. Please read over WP:USERNAME carefully before you create a new account. — Coren ^(talk) 01:12, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.