User talk:Pradipta.S

This is Pradipta.S's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Petroglyphs of Indian West Coast (January 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Petroglyphs of Indian West Coast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 12:44, 27 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johannes, I have been notified about the non reliability of the cited sources. Can you tell me which of the sources you find unreliable ? I have two of the academic papers which I have referred, in case if you are having difficulty is accessing them I can send them across. Other than academic papers one is a UNESCO document which is accessible to all, so are the news links.

Thanks,

Pradipta Pradipta.S (talk) 09:42, 28 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Johannes,

I have worked on my citations following Wikipedia guidelines since your last visit. Do you mind having a another look at it ?

Thanks,

Pradipta Pradipta.S (talk) 09:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Petroglyphs of Indian West Coast (February 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Brachy0008 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Not much change since last decline.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Petroglyphs of Indian West Coast and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Brachy08 _(Talk) 10:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Pradipta.S! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Brachy08 _(Talk) 10:42, 27 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Brachy0008

Dear Wiki Editor/Reviewer

My draft has been declined due to non verifiability/unreliability, the text says "This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources." May I know which of the citations are not verifiable and/or unreliable ? Is it possible that I get some details ? I think I cited only the very relevant sources. My citations are linked to source websites, hence at least verifiable. If you think any of the citations are unreliable you may let me know.

Thanks and Regards,

Pradipta Pradipta.S (talk) 07:38, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:RSP. And try referring to other articles. Brachy08 _(Talk) 08:24, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the source is not marked reliable (or situational) on the list, it won’t count. Brachy08 _(Talk) 08:26, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Brachy0008

BBC is marked as reliable, so they are not the issue. Academic journals are not on the list. But the ones I have referred to are very relevant to the content. Those articles contain a lot of information on the discovered petroglyphs, speaking volumes about how they are discovered, what they mean and so on. I can remove those references but it would be very unfair and utterly unethical. Moreover it is important to note that none of the academic journals are on that list.

UNESCO is not on the list . I think you will also agree that UNESCO articles in general can be trusted. Pradipta.S (talk) 15:31, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I’d let UNESCO pass, basically, the sources you have a generally ok, you just need more of them. Brachy08 _(Talk) 22:48, 28 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Two more references and a few wiki-links added. Pradipta.S (talk) 06:11, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Brachy0008

As suggested I tried referring/linking to other wiki pages, added two more references and made a few other changes. May I ask for a reconsideration, if you don't mind ? Pradipta.S (talk) 05:48, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can resubmit the draft, and hopefully someone can accept it. The draft has improved Brachy08 _(Talk) 13:06, 1 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]