User talk:Pranav2255

November 2021[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Marakkar: Lion of the Arabian Sea, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. You also removed reference without explanation. And do not rearrange content or cast randomly, it needs valid explanation and references. Premise should not be added unless the makers have officially released a synopsis, WP:CRYSTAL.--The Doom Patrol (talk) 15:38, 29 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

December 2021[edit]

Hello, I'm Robertjamal12. I noticed that you recently removed content from Lucifer (film) without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Robertjamal12 (talk) 03:18, 5 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

January 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Bro Daddy, you may be blocked from editing. You cannot rearrange cast according to your POV. Can't you read English? There is a hidden note which you ignored for tampering cast. Cast is arranged according to the film's onscreen credits.--The Doom Patrol (talk) 14:58, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Also learn WP:MOSCAPS. You cannot capitalize every word. This is an encyclopedia and has formatting guidelines.--The Doom Patrol (talk) 15:15, 1 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2022[edit]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Marakkar: Lion of the Arabian Sea, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Don't remove sources without explanation Diff: [1] Ab207 (talk) 05:52, 18 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Mis-used capital letters[edit]

Please stop adding incorrect capital letters as you have done at Kaduva and Paappan. Only proper nouns and the initial word of a sentence should be capitalized. - Arjayay (talk) 11:36, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

August 2022[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Kaduva, you may be blocked from editing.
You were clearly asked to stop adding misused capital letters above, but are continuing to do so - Arjayay (talk) 12:28, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Paappan.
Despite repeated warnings, you are still adding misused capital letters - please stop before you are blocked - Arjayay (talk) 12:19, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kaduva, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
Please 'stop adding capital lettersm as you do not seem to understand where they should be - Arjayay (talk) 12:45, 7 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Paappan, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 12:17, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Kaduva, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. - Arjayay (talk) 12:17, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:45, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Summer in Bethlehem.
You were blocked for disruption caused by your adding incorrect capital letters, and have continued doing so on expiry of your block. Please stop before you are blocked again - Arjayay (talk) 10:53, 10 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Mamangam (2019 film), you may be blocked from editing without further notice.
You are still adding incorrect capital letters, despite being blocked for that and receiving another final warning. Please stop before you are blocked again, which would be for longer, or even indefinitely - Arjayay (talk) 14:09, 11 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Pathonpatham Noottandu. - Arjayay (talk) 15:07, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:48, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]