User talk:Praxidicae/fakenews/voyagexx spam

So I came across these a couple of weeks ago but was hesitant to remove many of them because I incorrectly assumed it was related to an actual reputable film/script publisher. Turns out I was very wrong. See this article which details the nefarious nature of this paid for ~~scam~~ spam site(s). @JzG:, @Billinghurst:, is this suitable to blacklist without any sort of RFC? Praxidicae (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Noting

https://www.reddit.com/r/boston/comments/9hatd0/artists_beware_bostonvoyager_is_not_bostonbased/

Propose them at mediawiki talk:spam-blacklist as unreliable sources, add the discussive links, and see what happens is my best guess. These clearly fit on the ugly side of Wikipedia:Interviews based on the Fitch report statements, and the reddit response. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:33, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You could even consider chatting to the Fitch Report to see what else they may know. They may poke their nose into WPs and see what they can see. It may have an initial negative aspect if they discover something ugly, though that will just force the issue here, and shine a light with a disinfecting feature. — billinghurst sDrewth 01:38, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

already have mailed. :) Praxidicae (talk) 02:34, 22 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]