User talk:PrimEviL/01

Re: Image:DargoronZajecar.jpg

there was no issue with the rationale of that image and most of all - I DIDN'T RECIEVE ANY WARNING PRIOR TO SPEEDY DELETITION!!! i double-checked my talk page history, there was no warning regarding that image. --PrimEviL 10:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use images are not allowed when someone could reasonably find or take a photo and release it with a free-use license. Since the band appears to still be active, it's quite reasonable to do that. And you yourself placed the speedy deletion tag on the image when you uploaded it. I don't know how you didn't notice it, it's bright red. Melesse (talk) 14:21, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

As I said before, fair use images are not allowed when someone could reasonably find or take a photo and release it with a free-use license. Since the band appears to still be active, it's quite reasonable to do that. I suggest you go to one of their concerts or something and take a photo of them yourself. Then you can release it under a free-use license. Melesse (talk) 23:13, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Novak Đoković requested move

Some editors on the talk page claim you have withdrawn your request to move Novak Djokovic to Novak Đoković. If that's true, could you reinstate the request. The discussion seems to be going our way, but currently there is no way to legitimately move the article back. Admiral Norton ^(talk) 15:12, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have withdrawn it, because i didn't want to have anything to do with the narrowminded people. They believe having the point, double-standarded as they are, and they have more wiki-authority than i do. I realy wouldn't get myself involved into it again. Why don't you start the request?--PrimEviL 19:07, 2 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Krajina

On 31 December 1990 The Constitutional court of S.R. Croatia (which is part of Yugoslavia) declares that SAO Krajina is illegal. --Rjecina (talk) 03:46, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ustavni sud SFRJ je proglasio i nezavisnosti republika neustavnim, ali ih ovde ne karakterišemo na taj način, zar ne? Koji je smisao pozivati se na odluke ustavnog suda nepostojeće države(ili njenih republika)? Vidim da je već neki ostrašćeni vratio na moj edit, ali, molio bih te da ga ostaviš. Pozdravi. --PrimEviL 11:38, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Unlike all of those later republics, Republic of Serbian Krajina was not internationally recognised entity, and Krajina remained to be illegal entity in later Republic of Croatia. Saying that rebel Serbs "declared independence" would be give a gross understatement of what actually happened: failed attempt to create Greater Serbia within Croatian borders. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 20:52, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have never said that it was recognized, but what you are doing is pushing your Poing Of View, saying that they were the separatists, while they weren't the ones trying to seccede from SFRY. --PrimEviL 20:58, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That would be your POV view from Serbo-Yugoslavian perspective (good ol' times, aye?). For the rest of the world, Krajina was not a state, but a part of the internationally recognized Croatia, within it present day borders. During the brief existence of Krajina, there was no SFRY, and Krajina was not part of the Federal Republic of Yugoslavia either, so for all practical purposes rebel Serbs movement can be treated as internationally-illegal attempt of separatism from Croatia. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 21:32, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rebel - OK. Separatis - No. Sorry.--PrimEviL 21:36, 5 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note that WP is about building a consensus and not on insisting on absolutetely stated personal opinions, and my points remain valid whether you "agree" on them or not ^_^. --Ivan Štambuk (talk) 10:35, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, a consensus is hard to acchieve when you are claiming something from the biased point of view. It isn't important if I agree or not. --PrimEviL 14:39, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert of my edit on 4 July is made by our Balkan shame banned user User:PaxEquilibrium which has created until now around 50 puppets. He like to talk with himself [1] but there is no need to worry because until now his multiple personality agree 1 with another.

Because he is banned his edits do not exist and must be reverted.--Rjecina (talk) 17:18, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was not aware of that :) Anyhow, it seems that we're going to somewhat acceptable solution. Take care ;) --PrimEviL 17:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Another wikipedia rule: Editing against consensus is vandalism. User must be warned that his actions are against consensus. If he continue after that user will be blocked. This is warning fro article Operation Storm. You can see table about consensus about sources for Yugoslav Wars on talk page of this article or if you want to look all discussion about how this consensus is reached you must look talk page of Serbs of Croatia.

Even if you start discussion about HHO and consensus against HHO is reached Serbs in Krajina are rebels because New York Times which is Wikipedia respected source (and other respected sources) are telling that they are rebels. Our personal opinion is not important.--Rjecina (talk) 14:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

We have reached a level of consensus calling them rebels, what was the problem with that? i see now that everyone is just reverting without a single constructive addition... --PrimEviL 14:47, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry it has been my and your mistake. After seeing edit warring I have writen this comments on your talk page... user:PogledajDomSvoj is banned User:PaxEquilibrium, and edit of balkantropolis is against consensus about sources. My reaction for your reverting of Ivan Štambuk has been overkill. Sorry--Rjecina (talk) 19:44, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please communicate in English

I noticed that you have posted comments in a language other than English. When on the English-language Wikipedia, please always use English, no matter to whom you address your comments. This is so that comments may be comprehensible to the community at large. If the use of another language is unavoidable, please provide a translation of the comments. For more details, see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. __meco (talk) 12:25, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I am writing on my own language on my talk page. That's not allowed? :S --PrimEviL 12:28, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sure there's been much discussion about it somewhere, but I think you must use English also on your home page. As it says in the link which was provided, if you must use another language, you should provide a translation so that all users can follow what is being written. __meco (talk) 12:57, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Andy Roddick

Hi. Regarding your addition to the Andy Roddick article. First of all, the figure you give in the Roddick article (255kmph) doesn't match that on the Novak Djokovic article (250kmph), which appears to be disputed there anyway. Is it not an idea to gain consensus on that article first before bringing it to other articles?

Secondly, the addition is uncited. Please cite somewhere that discusses Roddick's record being 'overshadowed' before re-adding it. I also think that, since the section discusses Roddick's official record, it shouldn't be made to seem insignificant by a disputed and unofficial figure.

If Djokovic's serve is recognised as official, of course, everything changes. But until it is it shouldn't be allowed to intrude on other tennis players articles. --Escape Orbit ^(Talk) 22:05, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello to you too. I don't have nothing to add to what you've written but to make sure you understand that it wasn't my addition. And that there is a citation on Novak Djokovic's page. --PrimEviL 22:07, 18 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]