User talk:ProbablyJustAMisPrint
An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of CanadanHockley (talk · contribs · logs). Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful. Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth |
June 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm ZappaOMati. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Yoshi because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ZappaOMati 23:22, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Idk what you're talking about. Thanks.ProbablyJustAMisPrint (talk) 23:23, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- This edit. ZappaOMati 23:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oh snap, I'm sorry. It won't happen again. ProbablyJustAMisPrint (talk) 23:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- I hope so, especially since you made this edit a while later. ZappaOMati 23:29, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- That was an accident =) ProbablyJustAMisPrint (talk) 23:29, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- I hope so, especially since you made this edit a while later. ZappaOMati 23:29, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- Oh snap, I'm sorry. It won't happen again. ProbablyJustAMisPrint (talk) 23:26, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
- This edit. ZappaOMati 23:25, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Boing! said Zebedee. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Please do not troll other users. Arctic Kangaroo (✉ • ✎) 23:30, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Legoktm (talk) 23:31, 1 June 2013 (UTC)ProbablyJustAMisPrint (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I'm sorry! Second chance? ProbablyJustAMisPrint (talk) 23:33, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I agree; everyone deserves a chance for a do-over. That's why I've given you a second chance. By which I mean: a second block, this time without talkpage access. Ironholds (talk) 23:37, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.