User talk:PubliusJ/Archives/2010/March

Archives

I got a real job

I just wanted to stop by and say "hello" How are you doing? I got a real job and I do not have time to edit on here now. I get pad $8.00 a hour. My user's talk page has been vandalized 200+ times and my talk page has been protected 10+ times. Can you keep an eye on it for me. - - Talk to you soon. --Zink Dawg -- 05:21, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, bro! I'm not on as much any more either, I'm really caught up in school now, but I will make it a point to come on and look out for your page :) Check this out www.internetbrands.com .... I used to work for them, they're a really good employer and pay very well with TOTAL benefits. It doesn't take a lot of experience. GnarlyLikeWhoa (talk) 20:51, 13 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

2010

I wanted to give you a heads up about my removing the US healthcare bill entry in 2010. I saw your comment and request for consensus in the talk page; however, since the entry has been removed numerous times by various editors, the consensus is already that is should not be added. If the consensus changes in the interim discussion, then it can be added back in. My best to you... ttonyb (talk) 18:00, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-French sentiment in the United States

Well, the entire article isn’t consistent. —Wiki Wikardo 07:50, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Then have at it. Just remember that even articles about America ought not be America-centric, in other words, an article about French Toast shouldn't only be edited by French with their own interests. Wikipedia English is English-centric above all. The point I was making was that the first notice of British style should have set the stage for the rest of the article. But like I said, so long as it's consistent, have at it. GnarlyLikeWhoa (talk) 07:56, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

*rolleyes*

It’s not about sentiments in France, it’s about the United States. France isn’t an English-speaking nation. —Wiki Wikardo 08:12, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not amused. If you don't want to have a grown up conversation I will easily continue to oppose your action. You failed to realize that this issue isn't about France. It isn't about the United States. It isn't about anti-French sentiment in the United States. It's about writing style commonly used on Wikipedia. This conversation doesn't need to drag out as I suspect it will. Again, there exists no compelling reason to convert the writing style. GnarlyLikeWhoa (talk) 08:19, 24 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, PubliusJ. You have new messages at Hamiltonstone's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Your report at WP:ABUSE

Greetings! Thank you for filing an Abuse Report for abusive behavior originating from 90.220.8.86. Unfortunately, there was a problem with your filing and it has been rejected. Please see Wikipedia:Abuse response/90.220.8.86 for details on why the filing was rejected. You may also review filing criteria for abuse reports filings. Not enough blocks on this IP. Please re-list when there are at least five blocks. Thanks again, and keep up the positive contributions! ^Avicenna_sis @ 13:11, 25 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Sorry for the belated reply, but thanks for the compliment regarding Talk:2010#Health Care Reform. I admit, exclusion does seem counterintuitive; but I guess my mind has been wiki-warped enough to argue for it anyway. In any event, it looks like the US is going to get healthier and happier--and Wikipedia won't run out of room to document the good stuff. Cosmic Latte (talk) 17:58, 29 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]