User talk:Purunyuu

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Castlevania. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. TheLetterM (talk) 16:50, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

By the way, I've made a posting on WP:AN about this edit war under Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard#Edit_Warring_on_Castlevania to get an admin opinion on this incident. You might want to use this as a chance to discuss the incident as well as explain your actions. TheLetterM (talk) 17:10, 10 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

first of all, calm down, your edit summaries are not being ignored. however, it is your points versus the article at 1up, and wikipedia accepts reliable sources as a citation - not a wikipedia user's ideas, or "points". you need a source to confirm 1up is wrong, not your own original research. by all means remove it if you have one - a link or some sort of publication that wikipedia accepts, but according to the manual of style, your own research is not a valid source against 1up's article 92.10.206.91 (talk) 11:56, 28 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]