User talk:Pyrofyr

Regarding edits made to Ghost Online

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Pyrofyr! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule proboards\d{1,3}\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:53, 4 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost Online

If this sort of edit is repeated, you will be blocked from editing. You must have know that it was not acceptable, even without reading our policies and guidelines. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 16:04, 5 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming, and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 00:01, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, you mean so you can add offensive stuff like this or remove the ones that you don't want to spam? I see that I'm not the only one to remove the fancruft listiting. I think you need to read Wikipedia:External links especially Wikipedia:External links#Links normally to be avoided (look at #10). You should also check out the one and only edit here by Lilkidz]. I really like your comment that "...these websites all have much more information than the official site..." and "Unless you plan on adding all the information that these sites have readily available to Wikipedia, than I suggest it easier to simply leave the sites up." In other words instead of writing an article lets just have a bunch of external links. It's called Wikipedia:Spam. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:54, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 22:46, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Page blanking

Blanking your page is at best deprecated when it includes warnings, etc. You might want to archive it when it gets long. --Mel Etitis (Talk) 22:05, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why exactly is it wrong to blank your page? Some people like having their user pages blank, otherwise what's the point really? The warning is already lifted is it not? And if I can't blank it, where can I archive it? Since it shows up in history what's wrong with having the most recent one blank?Pyrofyr

I don't know why the point (of what?) is to have a blank page. See Wikipedia:User page for some guidleines on the use and status of User pages. Archiving, though, involves cut-and-pasting material from your Talk page to another page (say, User talk:Pyrofyr/Archive 1), and giving a link to it from this page.