User talk:Qqxxzz

Speedy deletion of Arvind Kulathu

A tag has been placed on Arvind Kulathu requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Beach drifter (talk) 19:52, 26 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.

You seem to have mistaken the computer scientist Arvind for someone named Arvind Kulathu, who I suspect is you or someone you know. You also seem to have mistaken a spammy site that sings "Peanut Butter Jelly Time" at you for a reference, and mistakenly thought that removing vandalism warnings made them okay.

That, or you thought that Wikipedians were gullible.

I am blocking you for 48 hours. I hope that after having taken the opportunity to screw with Wikipedia, and found it doesn't work, you can take this time to either figure out how to contribute something helpful or leave. Your edits should be backed by reliable sources. And please do not return to the Arvind Kulathu nonsense. rspεεr (talk) 05:13, 7 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism at Arvind (computer scientist). But why did you leave the link to the stupid "Peanut Butter Jelly Time" site that has nothing to do with Prof. Arvind?

It seems that what you removed was very similar to vandalism that you had previously inserted. Can you explain how those logged-out IPs that added the vandalism are connected to you? I am blocking them because I feel that they are alternate identities being used solely for vandalism. rspεεr (talk) 22:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...but do not spam

After further examination, I see that the net effect of your editing was to re-add the external link to that site, which I suspect is yours. This is spamming, which will result in you being blocked if you continue.

Please stop editing articles related to the name "Arvind", stop attempting to add your link, and consider this your last warning. rspεεr (talk) 03:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problems with Arvind Kulathu

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Arvind Kulathu, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=50746292024. As a copyright violation, Arvind Kulathu appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Arvind Kulathu has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Arvind Kulathu and send an email with the message to permissions-enwikimedia.org. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:Arvind Kulathu with a link to where we can find that note.
If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Arvind Kulathu.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. HalfShadow 22:09, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Arvind Kulathu has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Mikeo (talk) 22:11, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add hoaxes to Wikipedia. Hoaxes are caught and marked for deletion shortly after they are created. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method is to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia – and then to correct them if possible. Please don't disrupt Wikipedia in an attempt to test our ability to detect and remove such material. Feel free to take a look at the five pillars of Wikipedia policy to learn more about this project and how you can make a positive impact. Thank you.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:17, 4 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]