User talk:Quince Quincy

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Quince Quincy, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Crafty (talk) 04:50, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point

A word to to the wise. I think some of your recent edits may be attempts to explore the extent to which you can express your personal opinion in articles, and I'm guessing that isn't your actual intent, but rather an attempt to draw attention to some other injustice that someone else is up to. If not, please ignore this. If so, however, I want to encourage you to express your opinion more directly and without disrupting Wikipedia by such disruptive actions as tagging songs under the "racism" category on the basis of your interpretation of their lyrics. --TS 05:00, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abusing multiple accounts. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Risker (talk) 06:05, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Quince Quincy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why did you use checkuser on my account? There was no sockpuppetry investigation. My edits have not been in line with any banned user. No reason to suspect sockpuppetry.

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, namely, that you are a sock. Sandstein 06:52, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Might I suggest that you change your unblock request rationale? There is no reason specified for unblock. — neuro^(talk) 06:18, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think I should be giving you a tutorial on how to avoid future blocks, so I will not be telling you what triggered the suspicion that you were a returning indefinitely blocked user. Risker (talk) 06:24, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As per WP:BEANS, good call Risker. Again QQ, that's still not a request that directly addresses the reason for your block. If you want your request to be honored, you should explain the reason behind the circumstance, rather than just say you should have gotten away with it because there was no investigation. Dayewalker (talk) 06:25, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

userboxes

BTW, I didn't make either "offensive" user box, so why don't you complain to the person who did CTJF83Talk 07:18, 6 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]