User talk:R. Pidgeon
May 2011
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from Robert Priseman. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 19:17, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Robert Priseman, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. freshacconci talktalk 19:54, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
- Re: "all potential peacock terms removed and any essay style writing remidied". Why don't you let other editors decide that, i.e. editors who didn't write the text in the first place. This article needs serious editing beyond replacing a few words. freshacconci talktalk 20:02, 27 May 2011 (UTC)
Please edit using only one account. Using multiple accounts is sockpuppetry and can get you blocked. freshacconci talktalk 12:37, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/R. Pidgeon for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. freshacconci talktalk 12:43, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Blocked
[edit]Blocked for sock puppetry
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/R. Pidgeon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. Once the block has expired, you're welcome to make useful contributions. If you believe that this block was in error, and would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text{{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:54, 28 May 2011 (UTC) |
Bonzinio
[edit]Are you he ? When it comes to a 'battle of wills' with other more nerdy editors - one knows what you be up against ! Anoraker (talk) 11:15, 31 May 2011 (UTC)