Jump to content

User talk:RIH-V/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Translation Request

[edit]

Greetings RIH-V!

Can you please help me translate these passages into the unique Ukrainian language?


«Крещение водой— это таинство, совершаемое ради отпущения грехов и возрождения. Крещение должно совершаться в естественной воде, такой как река, море, или источник. Креститель, который уже получил крещение водой и Святым Духом, проводит крещение от имени Господа Иисуса Христа. Человек, получающий крещение должен быть полностью погружен в воду с наклоненной головой лицом вниз».

«Святое причастие — это таинство в ознаменование смерти Господа Иисуса Христа. Оно позволяет нам вкусить плоть и кровь нашего Бога и стать с Ним единым целым, чтобы обрести вечную жизнь и воскреснуть в Судный День. Это таинство должно совершаться как можно чаще. Используйте одну облатку (пресный хлеб) и виноградный сок».

« Истинная церковь Иисуса, установленная нашим господом Иисусом Христом, через Святой Дух во время времени «последнего дождя», это истинная восстановленная церковь апостольского времени »


Your help would be very gratefully appreciated, Thankyou very much.

--Jose77 09:35, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Хрещення водою - це таїнство, що чиниться через відпущення гріхів і відродження. Хрещення повинне відбуватися в природній воді, такий як ріка, море, або джерело. Хреститель, що вже одержав хрещення водою й Святим Духом, проводить хрещення від імені Господа Ісуса Христа. Людина, що одержує хрещення повиненна бути повністю занурена у воду з нахиленою головою обличчям униз".

Святе причастя - це таїнство на відзначення смерті Господа Ісуса Христа. Воно дозволяє нам вкусити плоть і кров нашого Бога й стати з Ним єдиним цілим, щоб мати вічне життя й воскреснути в Судний День. Це таїнство повинне відбуватися якнайчастіше. Використовується одна облатка (прісний хліб — маца) і виноградний сік.

Істинна церква Ісуса, установлена нашим Господом Ісусом Христом, через Святий Дух під час часу "останнього дощу", це справжня відновлена церква апостольського часу.

You are welcome. God bless you.--RIH-V 16:30, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

THANKYOU VERY VERY MUCH RIH-V for your wonderful translation effort!
May you prosper!
Yours Sincerely, From --Jose77 21:06, 3 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Zarzian culture, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://ancientneareast.tripod.com/Zarzi.html. As a copyright violation, Zarzian culture appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Zarzian culture has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Zarzian culture. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Zarzian culture, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Calton | Talk 06:43, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure I shall do it.--RIH-V 19:32, 4 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding this, please do not harass other users with assumption of bad faith and slanderous statements at their talk pages. As per WP:NPA#Consequences, "Abusive edit summaries are particularly ill-regarded." I reverted your entry. If you want to say something to another editor, do so properly. Happy edits, --Irpen 18:50, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two times User:Ghirlandajo has edited my edit. I have explained him the reason why it must be categorized thus. Instead response nonsense. I hope you learnt matter of this discussion with User:Ghirlandajo. Good wishes.--RIH-V 18:58, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for these policies. Good policies.--RIH-V 19:01, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
User Ghirlandajo reverted you because he in good faith disagreed with your edits. In return you accused him in "hating Ukraine" and "perverting history". These were highly offensive and unwarranted accusations. Ghirlandajo is free to have different views from those of yourself. This user from Russia wrote much more than yourself on en-wiki about Ukrainian historical landmarks, churches, cities, etc. See for instance his cotribtuions to: Charax, Crimea, Ovruch, Zymne Monastery, Staryi Chortoryisk, Halych, Chernihiv, Vyshhorod, Pochayiv Lavra, St. Michael's Golden-Domed Monastery and many more. Your accusations were ill-adviced and inappropriate. --Irpen 19:14, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I do not have less rights on Wikipedia than User:Ghirlandajo even I have a few edits. This habit of illuminating Ukrainian views is ill. Best wishes.--RIH-V 21:25, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is not about having more or less rights. This is about accusing the user who disagrees with you in hating Ukraine and perverting its history. No one has such rights. --Irpen
It is not good to accuse me of what I did not do. I left response about two inappropriate repeated edits with word nonsense on my edits and said here is no room for hating Ukraine and perverting history. I did not accuse User:Ghirlandajo in anything. Best wishes.--RIH-V 22:23, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
In your message you said to another user that he hates Ukrainians, Ukraine and perverts its history. These are your direct words and they are certainly accusatory. But I hope the points of both of us are well understood by now and future mistakes will be avoided. --Irpen 22:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Here are my words: Wikipedia is not a place for to hate Ukraine and Ukrainians. Your recently double edit my edit of Category:Kuban and Kuban is not even close to truth. Kuban is ukrainian cultural region. Additionally Kuban belonged Ukraine in 1918 when Kuban People Republic announced reunion with Ukraine. If you disagree with the history it can not affect encyclopedia and categorizing it. If you promote Russian fascism and hate against Ukrainian it is not acceptable for others. Best wishes. I did not say "He hates Ukrainians and Ukraine". I said here is no room for such things and after that pointed his attension on his edits for him to value them with good faith. I was a little bit sharp about fascism. I am sorry. And I wish to build good work cooperation. I hope you can see my best efforts and also respect to user:Ghirlandajo. Best wishes.--RIH-V 22:44, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
До речі я подивився на голосування по твоєї кандидатурі на адміністратора uk-wiki. Багато дописувачів так само звернули увагу на брак толерантності у випадках непогодження по статтям. На українському секторі en-wiki не так багато зацікавлених авторів, щоб витрачати час на такі немотивовані суперечки. Всього найкращого. --Irpen 21:45, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I hope, we shall not talk about my personality, even it is in Ukrainian. I am not here to discuss it. It is not so important matter about having tied Kuban to Ukrainian cultural region. Just do not oppose what is obvious. Good wishes.--RIH-V 22:08, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
What is obvious to some may not be obvious or even agreeable to others. This by itself does not represent pervertion of history or hatred towards Ukraine. The cultural link between Kuban and Ukraine does exist. Note, however, that the category is not called "Ukrainian etno-cultural regions". It is called "Ukrainian historical regions". I hope you can see the difference. Maybe we should rename the category first. --Irpen 22:17, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
This is obvious for me, it is why I added Kuban to "Ukrainian historical regions". That fact of Ukraine-Kuban Union in 1918 gives us rights to have Kuban in this category. We can create new category of ukranian cultural regions. Best wishes.--RIH-V 22:29, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vladyslav, if you could add to the Kuban article a little more on the Ukraine-Kuban Union, or if you could create an article on the union in the English wiki, it may help to resolve the problem.
And I must say, Irpen was wrong in going that far as accusing you for "accusing Ghirlandajo in hating Ukraine" [1]. He was wrong in going that far as digging into your contributions on Ukrainian wiki, and going over your personality. And, he was also biased in ignoring Ghirlandajo's reverts marked as "rmv nonsense" [2] and "rmv misleading cat" [3]. But regardless of that, please be tolerant on your side. --18:43, 17 October 2006 (UTC)

Pentecostalism

[edit]

Hello I've noticed that you have done many editing on Pentecostal churches articles, by chance do you have any relation or aquaitance with the Slavic Pentecostal Movement? I ask it because, I'm very interested in Eastern Protestantism and the Slavic Pentecostalism, which includes churches such the Union of Christians of Evangelical-Pentecostal Faith of Ukrainia. I'm intersted to know more about the ethos, costums, worship, etc See you around Leo Alves - Newport, RI —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Leonardo Alves (talkcontribs) 15:31, 4 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

Hello. I am part of Ukrainian (Eastern European) Pentecostal Movement. During Soviet times this Church was deep underground, because it did not accept Communist Party and Soviet government as the highest authority (it and its members had been sacrificing continuously). I found one book available in English "From Azusa Street to the U.S.S.R." by Fred Smolchuk, Assemblies of God minister. I will be glad to help you. May God bless you.--RIH-V 20:13, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Some good information, history and recent news can be obtained at Religious-Information Service of Ukraine.--RIH-V 20:32, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Siberian wikipedia

[edit]
Siberian wikipedia thanks you for your vote in our support. Unfortunately, many votes in this voting http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Proposals_for_closing_projects/Closure_of_Siberian_Wikipedia are alleged to be falsified. We need you to verify your vote. There are two ways of doing it: you can confirm it right below this request or you can do this by adding to your user page a link to your meta account (like this:[4]") —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 62.68.146.96 (talk) 06:59, 7 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]
I am against to harass every nation. So I voted on matter of Siberian wikipedia.--RIH-V 07:16, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Civility

[edit]

Hey, there! It seems that you're currently involved in a content dispute at Battle of Konotop -- if you haven't, already, please take a moment to familiarize yourself with our dispute resolution process, which begins with the use of talk pages, and can lead to steps such as a request for comment, a case with the Mediation Cabal or Mediation Committee, and can culminate at the Arbitration Committee.

I see that you've used the word "vandal" in some of your discussion; I'd like to ask that you refrain from doing so, in the future -- quoting from Wikipedia:Vandalism: "Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism." I encourage you to assume good faith whenever possible, and to keep a cool head whenever possible, working out your disagreements with other users without resorting to name-calling and accusations. This is just a friendly reminder. You are free to discuss, but please be sure to create an environment where people can speak freely and a variety of opinions can be welcomed. Thank you for your time. Kind regards, Luna Santin 10:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please, be respectful and civil when you come to my page - I do not expect you say me Hey. I was never involved in Battle of Konotop. When is illuminated complete country - that is vandalism.--RIH-V 18:11, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Fair enough -- "hey, there" is a pretty common informal greeting, in my area, and no disrespect was intended. Is there a greeting you would prefer, in the future? Luna Santin 23:21, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I understood you were not abusive. So, it is OK now. You can say "hi" or "hello", something what is widely acceptible, as you choose. I have noticed I was accused of personal attack on page were you are in charge. So, I am going to bring for your attention this attack. I was accused of been evangelical. The least what I am expecting to have on English Wikipedia to be attacked by trolls as Evangelical and Ukrainian.

Best wishes. If you have a solution, please, let me know.--RIH-V 02:56, 7 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:V. Calling the edits of your opponents as Vandalism is very disruptive. Happy edits, --Irpen 10:47, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Category:MAX

[edit]

It is proposed that Category:MAX be deleted as it seems to duplicate Category:Metropolitan Area Express (Portland, Oregon) (which should probably be at Category:MAX Light Rail. Jason McHuff 01:17, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I agree.--RIH-V 05:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re

[edit]

First of all what is your problem? Please give an example of me being a Russian nationalist and define the term in the process? Second of all why did you blank my addition to Religion in Ukraine or for that fact Religion in Russia. For your information the English spelling of the capital of Ukraine is Kiev, as confirmed by numerous policies. Before you criticise anyone on being a POV pusher please look in the mirror, and unless you have anything constructive, please do not pollute my talk page with useless rant. --Kuban Cossack 16:55, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:AIDS

[edit]

Hi Vladyslav Savelo, I am sorry for my late reply. You had left a message on my talk page here.

When I saw the article on the 24th of April, the content was this therefore I mistakenly thought it was vandalism.

Please forgive me. --Jose77 08:15, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Automobile Industry in Germany

[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Automobile Industry in Germany, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Automobile Industry in Germany. EconomistBR (talk) 00:58, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Automobile Industry in Germany

[edit]

An editor has nominated Automobile Industry in Germany, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Automobile Industry in Germany and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:59, 29 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

April 2008

[edit]

Please do not add copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to New Generation Church. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Whpq (talk) 02:18, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]