User talk:RachetPasse

This is RachetPasse's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

RachetPasse, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi RachetPasse! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 22 February 2021 (UTC)

March 2021

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on Taipei. How does the IP's edits constitute vandalism exactly? ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:10, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

It's an IP sock, look at its revision history. RachetPasse (talk) 04:12, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

RachetPasse, Ok never mind then. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 04:17, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nkon21 Could you help out here? This IP isn't stopping. Take a look at this SPI for further evidence. RachetPasse (talk) 04:23, 9 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Essec page

Hi RachetPasse, what's your problem with the name removal of the student in the controversies ? May be you find it right to denounce by name ? What does this have to do on the wiki page of a business school ? This part has already been removed a few months ago. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.83.87.133 (talk) 15:04, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

New section

Sore loser lol 123.195.130.73 (talk) 12:51, 17 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

April 2021

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 02:44, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]